Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
AnyDesk
AnyDesk
|
TeamViewer
TeamViewer
|
Splashtop
Splashtop
|
NordLayer
Nord Security
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Only one here with Self-hosted, White label
Free plan available
Can run on-premise
Turkish interface
|
Only one here with AI features, Video calls
Free plan available
Turkish interface
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Broadest feature coverage (15)
|
Can run on-premise
Public pricing
Lowest starting price here ($5 / month)
|
Public pricing
Largest vendor (2,000 employees)
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Single sign-on (SSO), SOC 2, HIPAA — offered by others here
Pricing only on request
Smallest vendor (450 employees) — check support capacity
Least established — vendor founded 2015
|
Cloud only
Pricing only on request
|
Lacks API access, Turkish interface — offered by others here
No free plan
No Turkish interface
No public adoption figures
|
Lacks API access, Multi-language, Turkish interface +1 more — offered by others here
No free plan
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
No public adoption figures
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Lightweight client with fast, low-latency connections
Works well on limited bandwidth
On-premise option for added control
|
Widely recognized and easy to start a session
Broad cross-platform device support
Rich features for remote support and management
|
Affordable compared to many remote access tools
Good performance with high-quality streaming
Separate products for access, support and education
|
Easy to deploy business VPN for SMBs
Simple admin panel for teams and gateways
Adds zero trust features over time
|
| Considerations |
Advanced management features need higher plans
Fewer built-in support tools than larger rivals
Free version has usage restrictions
|
Commercial licenses are relatively expensive
Free version may flag suspected commercial use
Licensing terms can be restrictive
|
Product lineup can be confusing
Fewer advanced IT management features
|
Dedicated gateways cost extra
Fewer enterprise features than SASE leaders
Limited granular policy controls
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | Free plan available | Free plan available | $5 / month | $8 / user/month |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium | Subscription | Subscription |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market |
| Industries served | — | — | — | — |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | 170K | 640K | — | — |
| Vendor employees | 450 | 1,900 | — | 2,000 |
| Headquarters | Stuttgart, DE | Göppingen, DE | Cupertino, US | Vilnius, LT |
| Founded | 2015 | 2005 | 2006 | 2012 |
| Categories | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Screen sharing | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Video calls | — | ✓ | — | — |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SOC 2 | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| White label | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Self-hosted | ✓ | — | — | — |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| Mobile app | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-language | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| Audit log | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.