Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
AVEVA PI System
AVEVA
|
Claroty xDome
Claroty
|
ArcGIS
Esri
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages | No relative advantage on tracked data |
Only one here with AI features, Inventory tracking
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Largest vendor (270,000 employees)
Longest track record — vendor founded 1911
|
No relative advantage on tracked data |
Only one here with Multi-language, Integrations marketplace
Free trial available
Runs on the most platforms (4)
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Mobile app, Single sign-on (SSO), Audit log +1 more — offered by others here
No free trial
Narrowest feature scope (3)
|
No free trial
|
Lacks Mobile app, Offline mode — offered by others here
No free trial
Least established — vendor founded 2015
|
Smallest vendor (4,000 employees) — check support capacity
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Proven historian for industrial time-series data
Wide range of connectors for OT systems
Scales across sites and assets
|
Comprehensive asset and maintenance management
Predictive maintenance and monitoring capabilities
Proven in asset-intensive industries
|
Deep visibility into OT and industrial assets
Understands many industrial protocols
Risk prioritization tailored to OT environments
|
Comprehensive mapping and spatial analysis tools
Large ecosystem of data and apps
Flexible cloud, on-premise and hybrid deployment
|
| Considerations |
Licensing can be complex and costly
Requires specialist skills to administer
Modern analytics may need extra tools
|
Complex implementation and upgrades
Interface has a steep learning curve
High total cost of ownership
|
Deployment across sites can be complex
Specialized focus may need separate IT tools
|
Steep learning curve for advanced features
Licensing and credits can be complex
Costly for small organizations
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | Contact for quote | Contact for quote | Contact for quote | Price not listed |
| Pricing model | Quote-based | Quote-based | Quote-based | Subscription |
| Free plan | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Free trial | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | On-premise, Cloud (SaaS), Hybrid | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise, Hybrid | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise, Hybrid |
| Platforms | Web, Windows | Web, iOS, Android | Web | Web, Windows, iOS, Android |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Enterprise | Enterprise | Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | Energy, resources & utilities, Manufacturing & industrial, Life sciences, Transportation & logistics | Banking & capital markets, Insurance, Government & public sector, Healthcare, Manufacturing & industrial, Technology, media & telecom | Manufacturing & industrial, Energy, resources & utilities, Healthcare, Life sciences, Real estate & construction | Government & public sector, Energy, resources & utilities, Transportation & logistics, Real estate & construction, Retail & consumer, Education |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | — | — | — |
| Vendor employees | — | 270,000 | — | 4,000 |
| Headquarters | Cambridge, GB | Armonk, NY, US | New York, NY, US | Redlands, CA, US |
| Founded | 1967 | 1911 | 2015 | 1969 |
| Categories | Data Platforms & Warehousing, GIS, IoT & Industrial | Asset & Field Service Management, GIS, IoT & Industrial | Network & Cloud Security, Vulnerability & Exposure Management, GIS, IoT & Industrial | Asset & Field Service Management, GIS, IoT & Industrial |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | — | ✓ | — | — |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations marketplace | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Inventory tracking | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Mobile app | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Multi-language | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Offline mode | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Dashboards | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit log | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.