Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
CircleCI
CircleCI
|
GitHub
GitHub
|
GitLab
GitLab
|
Jenkins
Linux Foundation
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Public pricing
|
Only one here with Mobile app
Free trial available
Public pricing
Lowest starting price here ($4 / user/month)
Largest vendor (3,000 employees)
|
Free trial available
Turkish interface
Public pricing
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Broadest feature coverage (17)
|
Open source
Turkish interface
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks GDPR compliance, ISO 27001, Multi-language +4 more — offered by others here
No free trial
No Turkish interface
No public adoption figures
Smallest vendor (500 employees) — check support capacity
|
Lacks Dashboards, Turkish interface, Open source — offered by others here
No Turkish interface
|
Lacks Integrations marketplace — offered by others here
No public adoption figures
Highest starting price here ($29 / user/month)
|
Lacks Single sign-on (SSO), Two-factor authentication, SOC 2 +5 more — offered by others here
No free trial
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
Narrowest feature scope (10)
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Fast builds with caching and parallelism
Clean YAML configuration
Supports cloud and self-hosted runners
|
Large developer community and ecosystem
Integrated Actions for CI/CD
Strong pull request and code review tools
|
Single application from planning to deployment
Built-in CI/CD with self-hosting option
Integrated security scanning
|
Free and open source
Huge plugin ecosystem
Highly flexible pipelines as code
|
| Considerations |
Credit-based pricing can be hard to predict
Costs grow with heavy build usage
Debugging complex configs can be tricky
|
Actions minutes and storage can add cost
Advanced security features are paid add-ons
Project management is lighter than dedicated tools
|
Interface can feel complex and dense
Self-managed instances need maintenance
Many advanced features require top tiers
|
Requires self-hosting and ongoing maintenance
Plugin compatibility issues can arise
Dated user interface
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | $15 / month | $4 / user/month | $29 / user/month | Free |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium | Freemium | Open source |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | On-premise |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android | Web | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Target size | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | — | — | — | — |
| Active users | — | 100M | — | — |
| Customers | — | — | — | — |
| Vendor employees | 500 | 3,000 | 2,100 | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, US | San Francisco, US | San Francisco, US | San Francisco, US |
| Founded | 2011 | 2007 | 2011 | 2007 |
| Categories | DevOps & Version Control | DevOps & Version Control | DevOps & Version Control | DevOps & Version Control, Automation & Integration (iPaaS) |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | — | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Workflow automation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| GDPR compliance | — | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| ISO 27001 | — | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| SOC 2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Open source | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Self-hosted | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations marketplace | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Webhooks | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Multi-language | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turkish interface | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kanban boards | — | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Dashboards | ✓ | — | ✓ | — |
| Audit log | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Two-factor authentication | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.