Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Domo
Domo
|
Microsoft Power BI
Microsoft
|
Tableau
Salesforce
|
Qlik Sense
Qlik
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Free plan available
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
Only one here with Turkish interface, Integrations marketplace
Free plan available
Can run on-premise
Turkish interface
Public pricing
|
Can run on-premise
Public pricing
Deloitte alliance partner
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
Can run on-premise
Deloitte alliance partner
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Self-hosted — offered by others here
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
Pricing only on request
Narrowest feature scope (14)
|
No relative drawback on tracked data |
No free plan
No Turkish interface
Highest starting price here ($15 / user/month)
|
No free plan
No Turkish interface
Pricing only on request
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
All-in-one cloud platform from integration to dashboards
Large library of data connectors
Good mobile experience for executives
|
Low entry cost for self-service BI
Deep integration with Excel and Microsoft 365
Large community and learning resources
|
Powerful, flexible data visualization
Strong community and visualization gallery
Connects to a wide range of data sources
|
Associative engine reveals hidden data relationships
Strong data integration capabilities
Flexible cloud and on-premise deployment
|
| Considerations |
Pricing can be high and hard to predict
Advanced customization has a learning curve
Cloud-only deployment
|
DAX and data modeling have a learning curve
Desktop authoring is Windows-only
Capacity licensing gets costly at scale
|
Higher cost than many BI alternatives
Advanced analysis has a learning curve
Data preparation often needs separate tools
|
Scripting and data load have a learning curve
Pricing can be high for large deployments
Visual customization can be limited
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | Contact for quote | $14 / user/month | $15 / user/month | Price not listed |
| Pricing model | Quote-based | Freemium | Subscription | Subscription |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | — | — | Banking & capital markets, Healthcare, Retail & consumer, Government & public sector, Education, Cross-industry | Banking & capital markets, Healthcare, Manufacturing & industrial, Retail & consumer, Government & public sector, Cross-industry |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | — | — | — |
| Vendor employees | 876 | 228,000 | 76,000 | 4,500 |
| Headquarters | American Fork, US | Redmond, US | San Francisco, US | King of Prussia, US |
| Founded | 2010 | 1975 | 1999 | 1993 |
| Categories | Business Intelligence (BI) | Business Intelligence (BI) | Business Intelligence (BI) | Business Intelligence (BI) |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SOC 2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Self-hosted | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations marketplace | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Mobile app | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-language | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turkish interface | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Custom reports | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dashboards | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit log | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.