comparare

Compare

Review up to 6 products side by side.

JSON
Drupal logo
Drupal
Drupal Association
WordPress logo
WordPress
WordPress Foundation
Webflow logo
Webflow
Webflow
Head-to-head in this comparison
Advantages
Free plan available
Open source
Can run on-premise
Turkish interface
Only one here with Mobile app
Free plan available
Open source
Can run on-premise
Turkish interface
Only one here with ISO 27001, HIPAA, Segmentation
Can run on-premise
Deloitte alliance partner
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Largest vendor (30,000 employees)
Only one here with Two-factor authentication
Free plan available
Public pricing
Broadest feature coverage (13)
Drawbacks
Lacks Webhooks, Template library, Single sign-on (SSO) +4 more — offered by others here
Pricing only on request
Narrowest feature scope (8)
Lacks Audit log, Single sign-on (SSO), GDPR compliance +3 more — offered by others here
Pricing only on request
Lacks Turkish interface, Integrations marketplace, Self-hosted +3 more — offered by others here
No free plan
No Turkish interface
Pricing only on request
Lacks Turkish interface, Self-hosted, Open source — offered by others here
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
Smallest vendor (700 employees) — check support capacity
Least established — vendor founded 2013
Editorial assessment
Strengths
Robust for complex, large-scale sites
Granular permissions and multilingual support
Free and open-source with active community
Free, open-source and self-hostable
Huge ecosystem of themes and plugins
Large community and talent pool
Combined web content and digital asset management
Deep integration with Adobe Experience Cloud
Scales to large multi-site, multilingual estates
Pixel-level design control without writing code
Clean, production-ready HTML and CSS output
Flexible CMS collections for dynamic content
Considerations
Steep learning curve for developers and editors
Major upgrades can be resource-intensive
Requires specialized and often costly talent
Requires ongoing updates and maintenance
Plugin sprawl can hurt performance
Hosting, security and backups are your responsibility
High licensing and implementation costs
Complex to implement and maintain
Requires specialized developers and partners
Steep learning curve for non-designers
Site and workspace plans can add up quickly
Ecommerce capabilities are relatively limited
Product & company facts
Deloitte alliance ✕ ✕ ✓ ✕
Rating — — — —
Starting price Free Free Contact for quote $14 / month
Pricing model Open source Open source Quote-based Freemium
Free plan ✓ ✓ ✕ ✓
Free trial ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕
Open source ✓ ✓ ✕ ✕
Deployment On-premise, Cloud (SaaS) On-premise, Cloud (SaaS) Cloud (SaaS), On-premise Cloud (SaaS)
Platforms Web Web, iOS, Android Web Web
Turkish interface ✓ ✓ ✕ ✕
Target size Mid-market, Enterprise Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Enterprise Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Industries served — — Retail & consumer, Technology, media & telecom, Banking & capital markets, Cross-industry —
Active users — — — —
Customers — — — —
Vendor employees — — 30,000 700
Headquarters Portland, US San Francisco, US San Jose, US San Francisco, US
Founded 2009 2010 1982 2013
Categories Content Management (CMS) Website Builders, Content Management (CMS) Content Management (CMS) Website Builders, Content Management (CMS)
Features
AI features — — ✓ ✓
GDPR compliance — — ✓ ✓
HIPAA — — ✓ —
ISO 27001 — — ✓ —
SOC 2 — — ✓ ✓
Template library — ✓ — ✓
Open source ✓ ✓ — —
Self-hosted ✓ ✓ — —
API access ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Integrations marketplace ✓ ✓ — ✓
Webhooks — ✓ — ✓
A/B testing — — ✓ ✓
Segmentation — — ✓ —
Mobile app — ✓ — —
Multi-language ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Turkish interface ✓ ✓ — —
Audit log ✓ — ✓ ✓
Role-based access ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Single sign-on (SSO) — — ✓ ✓
Two-factor authentication — — — ✓

Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.

Compare
Compare →