Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
ESET PROTECT
ESET
|
Sophos Intercept X
Sophos
|
Bitdefender GravityZone
Bitdefender
|
Trend Vision One
Trend Micro
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Only one here with Turkish interface
Can run on-premise
Turkish interface
|
Longest track record — vendor founded 1985
|
Can run on-premise
|
Can run on-premise
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Largest vendor (7,000 employees)
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Single sign-on (SSO), SOC 2 — offered by others here
Smallest vendor (1,000 employees) — check support capacity
|
Lacks Mobile app, Self-hosted — offered by others here
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
|
Lacks Single sign-on (SSO), SOC 2 — offered by others here
No Turkish interface
Least established — vendor founded 2001
|
Lacks Mobile app, Self-hosted — offered by others here
No Turkish interface
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Low system resource usage
Straightforward deployment and management
Cloud or on-premise console options
|
Strong anti-ransomware and exploit protection
Central management through Sophos Central
Works well alongside Sophos firewall products
|
Strong malware detection with low performance impact
Single console for endpoints, servers and cloud
Includes risk analytics and patch management options
|
Correlates endpoint, email, cloud and network data
Broad coverage for hybrid and cloud workloads
Attack surface risk management built in
|
| Considerations |
Advanced EDR features require higher tiers
Reporting is less flexible than some rivals
Interface can feel less modern
|
Agent can be resource-heavy on older machines
Console navigation can feel cluttered
|
Console has a learning curve
Some modules are paid add-ons
Support experience can vary by region
|
Platform breadth adds complexity
Credit-based licensing can be hard to plan
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | Price not listed | Contact for quote | Price not listed | Contact for quote |
| Pricing model | Subscription | Quote-based | Subscription | Quote-based |
| Free plan | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS), Hybrid |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, Android | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | — | — | — | — |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | — | — | — |
| Vendor employees | 1,000 | 4,500 | 1,800 | 7,000 |
| Headquarters | Bratislava, SK | Abingdon, GB | Bükreş, RO | Tokyo, JP |
| Founded | 1992 | 1985 | 2001 | 1988 |
| Categories | Endpoint Security | Endpoint Security | Endpoint Security | Endpoint Security |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SOC 2 | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Self-hosted | ✓ | — | ✓ | — |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app | ✓ | — | ✓ | — |
| Multi-language | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Custom reports | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dashboards | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit log | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.