Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Framer
Framer
|
Wix
Wix
|
Webflow
Webflow
|
Squarespace
Squarespace
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Free plan available
Lowest starting price here ($10 / month)
|
Only one here with ISO 27001, Turkish interface
Free plan available
Turkish interface
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Broadest feature coverage (14)
|
Only one here with Webhooks, Audit log
Free plan available
|
Free trial available
Longest track record — vendor founded 2004
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Mobile app, Two-factor authentication, Integrations marketplace +1 more — offered by others here
No free trial
No Turkish interface
No public adoption figures
Smallest vendor (150 employees) — check support capacity
|
Lacks A/B testing — offered by others here
No free trial
Highest starting price here ($17 / month)
|
Lacks Mobile app, Online payments — offered by others here
No free trial
No Turkish interface
No public adoption figures
|
Lacks Single sign-on (SSO), SOC 2, A/B testing +1 more — offered by others here
No free plan
No Turkish interface
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Design-tool feel familiar to Figma users
Smooth animations and interactions built in
Fast publishing with hosting included
|
Easy drag-and-drop editor
Large selection of templates and apps
Hosting, domains and ecommerce in one place
|
Pixel-level design control without writing code
Clean, production-ready HTML and CSS output
Flexible CMS collections for dynamic content
|
Polished, design-focused templates out of the box
All-in-one hosting, domains and ecommerce
Easy drag-and-drop editing for non-technical users
|
| Considerations |
Limited CMS depth for content-heavy sites
Not suited to complex ecommerce
Advanced customization needs code components
|
Switching templates later is difficult
Free plan shows Wix branding
Less flexible for complex or large sites
|
Steep learning curve for non-designers
Site and workspace plans can add up quickly
Ecommerce capabilities are relatively limited
|
Limited flexibility for custom layouts and code
Smaller app and integration ecosystem than rivals
Ecommerce features less advanced for large catalogs
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | $10 / month | $17 / month | $14 / month | $16 / month |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium | Freemium | Subscription |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Free trial | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS | Web, iOS, Android | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Freelancer, Small business |
| Industries served | — | — | — | — |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | 6M | — | 5M |
| Vendor employees | 150 | 5,929 | 700 | 1,750 |
| Headquarters | Amsterdam, NL | Tel Aviv, IL | San Francisco, US | New York, US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2006 | 2013 | 2004 |
| Categories | Landing Page Builders, Website Builders | E-Commerce Platforms, Website Builders | Website Builders, Content Management (CMS) | E-Commerce Platforms, Website Builders |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | — | ✓ | — | — |
| SOC 2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Template library | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Online payments | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations marketplace | — | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Webhooks | — | — | ✓ | — |
| A/B testing | ✓ | — | ✓ | — |
| Mobile app | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Multi-language | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turkish interface | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Audit log | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Two-factor authentication | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.