Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
GitHub
GitHub
|
GitLab
GitLab
|
Bitbucket
Atlassian
|
Azure DevOps
Microsoft
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Only one here with Mobile app
Free trial available
Runs on the most platforms (5)
|
Only one here with Open source
Free trial available
Turkish interface
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Broadest feature coverage (17)
|
Free trial available
Deloitte alliance partner
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Lowest starting price here ($3.30 / user/month)
|
Turkish interface
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Largest vendor (228,000 employees)
Longest track record — vendor founded 1975
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Turkish interface, Dashboards — offered by others here
No Turkish interface
|
Lacks Integrations marketplace — offered by others here
No public adoption figures
Highest starting price here ($29 / user/month)
Smallest vendor (2,100 employees) — check support capacity
Least established — vendor founded 2011
|
Lacks Kanban boards, Self-hosted, Turkish interface +1 more — offered by others here
No Turkish interface
No public adoption figures
Narrowest feature scope (13)
|
Lacks AI features — offered by others here
No free trial
No public adoption figures
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Large developer community and ecosystem
Integrated Actions for CI/CD
Strong pull request and code review tools
|
Single application from planning to deployment
Built-in CI/CD with self-hosting option
Integrated security scanning
|
Tight integration with Jira and Confluence
Built-in Pipelines for CI/CD
Affordable for small teams
|
End-to-end suite with boards, repos and pipelines
Strong integration with Azure and Microsoft tools
Flexible pipelines for many platforms
|
| Considerations |
Actions minutes and storage can add cost
Advanced security features are paid add-ons
Project management is lighter than dedicated tools
|
Interface can feel complex and dense
Self-managed instances need maintenance
Many advanced features require top tiers
|
Smaller community than GitHub
Pipelines build minutes can be limiting
Fewer third-party integrations
|
Interface can feel complex
Best suited to Microsoft-centric teams
Some modules feel less modern than rivals
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | $4 / user/month | $29 / user/month | $3.30 / user/month | $6 / user/month |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android | Web | Web | Web |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Target size | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | — | — | Technology, media & telecom, Cross-industry, Banking & capital markets, Government & public sector | — |
| Active users | 100M | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | — | — | — |
| Vendor employees | 3,000 | 2,100 | 12,000 | 228,000 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, US | San Francisco, US | Sydney, AU | Redmond, US |
| Founded | 2007 | 2011 | 2002 | 1975 |
| Categories | DevOps & Version Control | DevOps & Version Control | DevOps & Version Control | Project Management, DevOps & Version Control |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Workflow automation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SOC 2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Self-hosted | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations marketplace | ✓ | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webhooks | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Multi-language | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turkish interface | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Kanban boards | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Dashboards | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Audit log | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.