Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Google Forms
Google
|
Typeform
Typeform
|
Jotform
Jotform
|
Microsoft Forms
Microsoft
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Turkish interface
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
Public pricing
Lowest starting price here ($25 / month)
|
Only one here with Workflow automation, Online payments, Chatbot +1 more
Can run on-premise
Turkish interface
Public pricing
Broadest feature coverage (19)
|
Turkish interface
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Largest vendor (228,000 employees)
Longest track record — vendor founded 1975
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks API access, Webhooks, Single sign-on (SSO) +8 more — offered by others here
Cloud only
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
Narrowest feature scope (5)
|
Lacks Turkish interface, Mobile app — offered by others here
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
No public adoption figures
Smallest vendor (400 employees) — check support capacity
|
Lacks ISO 27001 — offered by others here
Highest starting price here ($34 / month)
|
Lacks API access, Webhooks, Two-factor authentication +4 more — offered by others here
Cloud only
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Free and very easy to use
Responses flow directly into Google Sheets
Real-time collaboration on form editing
|
Engaging, conversational form experience
Polished design with good completion rates
Integrates with many marketing tools
|
Large template library and drag-and-drop builder
Payment, approval and workflow features
Many integrations and widgets
|
Included with Microsoft 365 accounts
Simple quizzes, polls and surveys
Results connect to Excel and Teams
|
| Considerations |
Limited design and branding options
Basic logic and question types
Minimal advanced analytics
|
Response limits on lower plans
Gets expensive for high volumes
Less suited to long, complex surveys
|
Free plan has submission limits
Branding removal requires paid plans
Interface can feel cluttered with many options
|
Limited customization and branding
Basic question logic
Less suited to external research surveys
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | Free | $25 / month | $34 / month | Free |
| Pricing model | Free | Freemium | Freemium | Free |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Platforms | Web | Web | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Target size | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | — | — | — | — |
| Active users | — | — | 25M | — |
| Customers | — | — | — | — |
| Vendor employees | 183,000 | 400 | 800 | 228,000 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, US | Barselona, ES | San Francisco, US | Redmond, US |
| Founded | 1998 | 2012 | 2006 | 1975 |
| Categories | Surveys & Forms | Surveys & Forms | Low-Code / No-Code, Surveys & Forms | Surveys & Forms |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Workflow automation | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Chatbot | — | — | ✓ | — |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | — | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| ISO 27001 | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| SOC 2 | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Template library | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| E-signature | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Online payments | — | — | ✓ | — |
| API access | — | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Integrations marketplace | — | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Webhooks | — | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Zapier integration | — | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Mobile app | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-language | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | — | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | — | ✓ | ✓ | — |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.