Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
GoTo Meeting
GoTo
|
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft
|
Zoom Workplace
Zoom Communications
|
Webex
Cisco
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Free trial available
|
Only one here with Workflow automation, Email integration, File versioning
Free plan available
Free trial available
Turkish interface
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
Free plan available
Turkish interface
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
Free plan available
Free trial available
Can run on-premise
Turkish interface
Deloitte alliance partner
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks API access, Webhooks, Audit log +5 more — offered by others here
No free plan
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
No public adoption figures
|
Cloud only
|
No free trial
Cloud only
Least established — vendor founded 2011
|
Lacks Integrations marketplace — offered by others here
No public adoption figures
Highest starting price here ($14.50 / user/month)
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Reliable audio and video for business calls
Simple scheduling and joining
Integrates with common calendars
|
Deep integration with Microsoft 365 apps
Chat, meetings and file collaboration in one place
Often included in existing Microsoft licenses
|
Reliable, high-quality video meetings
Easy for external participants to join
Webinars, chat and phone in one platform
|
Strong enterprise security and compliance features
Integrates with Cisco hardware and calling
Supports large meetings and events
|
| Considerations |
Fewer collaboration features than newer rivals
Interface feels less modern
|
Interface can feel cluttered
Can be resource-heavy on desktop
Less appealing outside the Microsoft ecosystem
|
Free plan has meeting time limits
Add-ons like webinars cost extra
Extra apps beyond meetings are less mature
|
Interface can feel complex
Setup and administration are heavier than lighter tools
Advanced features add to the cost
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | $12 / user/month | $4 / user/month | $13.33 / user/month | $14.50 / user/month |
| Pricing model | Subscription | Freemium | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free plan | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS), Hybrid |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Target size | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | — | — | — | Cross-industry, Technology, media & telecom, Government & public sector, Banking & capital markets, Healthcare, Manufacturing & industrial |
| Active users | — | 320M | — | — |
| Customers | — | — | 192K | — |
| Vendor employees | 3,000 | 228,000 | 7,400 | 86,200 |
| Headquarters | Boston, US | Redmond, US | San Jose, US | San Jose, US |
| Founded | 2003 | 1975 | 2011 | 1984 |
| Categories | Video Conferencing | Team Communication, Video Conferencing | Team Communication, Video Conferencing | Team Communication, Video Conferencing |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Workflow automation | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Screen sharing | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Video calls | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SOC 2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| File versioning | — | ✓ | — | — |
| API access | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Calendar integration | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email integration | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Integrations marketplace | — | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Webhooks | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-language | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turkish interface | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit log | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.