Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Katana
Katana
|
Cin7 Core
Cin7
|
Fishbowl Inventory
Fishbowl
|
Oracle NetSuite
Oracle
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Free trial available
|
Only one here with Marketplace integration
Free trial available
Public pricing
|
Free trial available
Can run on-premise
Most deployment options (Cloud (SaaS), On-premise)
Runs on the most platforms (4)
|
Only one here with Single sign-on (SSO), Two-factor authentication, Audit log +7 more
Deloitte alliance partner
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Broadest feature coverage (19)
Largest vendor (162,000 employees)
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Mobile app, Workflow automation — offered by others here
Cloud only
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
Smallest vendor (150 employees) — check support capacity
|
Cloud only
No public adoption figures
|
Lacks Webhooks, Multi-currency, Workflow automation — offered by others here
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
Narrowest feature scope (6)
|
No free trial
Cloud only
Pricing only on request
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Visual production planning for small manufacturers
Real-time inventory and material tracking
Integrations with Shopify and accounting tools
|
Combines inventory, light manufacturing and B2B sales
Integrations with major accounting tools
Supports multiple warehouses and channels
|
Deep integration with QuickBooks
Covers inventory, manufacturing and warehousing
Available as cloud or on-premise
|
Unified cloud ERP, CRM and e-commerce
Strong multi-subsidiary and global support
Highly customizable with scripting
|
| Considerations |
Limited depth for complex manufacturing processes
Accounting must be handled in a separate tool
Costs grow with added users and features
|
Relatively high cost for small businesses
Setup and learning curve can be significant
Reporting customization is limited
|
Interface feels dated
Implementation and training take time
|
Costs rise with modules and users
Implementation can be complex
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | Price not listed | $349 / month | Contact for quote | Contact for quote |
| Pricing model | Subscription | Subscription | Quote-based | Quote-based |
| Free plan | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Small business, Mid-market | Small business, Mid-market | Small business, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | — | — | — | Retail & consumer, Manufacturing & industrial, Technology, media & telecom, Professional services, Nonprofit, Cross-industry |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | — | — | 40K |
| Vendor employees | 150 | 350 | — | 162,000 |
| Headquarters | Tallinn, EE | Auckland, NZ | Utah, US | Austin, US |
| Founded | 2017 | 2012 | 2001 | 1977 |
| Categories | ERP, Inventory Management | Inventory Management | Inventory Management | CRM, Accounting, Invoicing & Billing, ERP, Inventory Management |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Workflow automation | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| GDPR compliance | — | — | — | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | — | — | — | ✓ |
| SOC 2 | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Marketplace integration | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Bank integration | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Multi-currency | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Recurring billing | — | — | — | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webhooks | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Inventory tracking | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-language | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Custom reports | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dashboards | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit log | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | — | — | — | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.