Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
lifebox
Turkcell
|
Dropbox
Dropbox
|
Google Drive
Google
|
Microsoft OneDrive
Microsoft
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Only one here with KVKK compliance (Turkey)
Turkish interface
|
Only one here with Webhooks, Integrations marketplace, Zapier integration +1 more
Free trial available
Public pricing
Broadest feature coverage (18)
Runs on the most platforms (6)
|
Turkish interface
Public pricing
|
Free trial available
Turkish interface
Public pricing
Largest vendor (228,000 employees)
Longest track record — vendor founded 1975
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks API access, Single sign-on (SSO), Two-factor authentication +10 more — offered by others here
No free trial
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
Narrowest feature scope (3)
|
Lacks Turkish interface — offered by others here
No Turkish interface
Highest starting price here ($9.99 / month)
Smallest vendor (2,200 employees) — check support capacity
Least established — vendor founded 2007
|
No free trial
No public adoption figures
|
No public adoption figures
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Turkish-language service with local data storage
Automatic photo and video backup
Convenient for Turkcell subscribers
|
Fast, reliable file sync across devices
Easy sharing with external users
Integrates with many productivity apps
|
Generous free storage with a Google account
Real-time collaboration with Google Docs
Powerful search across files
|
Built into Windows and Microsoft 365
Co-authoring in Word, Excel and PowerPoint
Files on-demand saves local disk space
|
| Considerations |
Limited business and team collaboration features
Fewer third-party integrations
Mainly aimed at consumers in Turkey
|
Free plan offers limited storage
Costs more than storage bundled with office suites
Device limits on the free tier
|
Folder and permission management can get messy
Desktop sync is less flexible than some rivals
Privacy-sensitive teams may prefer other options
|
Sync issues reported with large libraries
Sharing settings can be confusing
Best experience within the Microsoft ecosystem
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | Free plan available | $9.99 / month | $1.99 / month | $1.99 / month |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Target size | Freelancer, Small business | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | — | — | — | — |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | 18M | — | — |
| Vendor employees | 13,901 | 2,200 | 183,000 | 228,000 |
| Headquarters | İstanbul, TR | San Francisco, US | Mountain View, US | Redmond, US |
| Founded | 1994 | 2007 | 1998 | 1975 |
| Categories | File Sharing & Storage | File Sharing & Storage | File Sharing & Storage | File Sharing & Storage |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| GDPR compliance | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| KVKK compliance (Turkey) | ✓ | — | — | — |
| SOC 2 | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| E-signature | — | ✓ | — | — |
| File versioning | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations marketplace | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Webhooks | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Zapier integration | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Mobile app | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-language | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Offline mode | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit log | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.