Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Logo Bordro Plus
Logo Yazılım
|
Kolay İK
Kolay İK
|
Gusto
Gusto
|
Deel
Deel
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Can run on-premise
Turkish interface
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Longest track record — vendor founded 1984
|
Only one here with Custom fields
Free trial available
Turkish interface
|
Public pricing
Largest customer base (400K)
|
Only one here with Webhooks, Audit log, GDPR compliance +4 more
Free plan available
Public pricing
Broadest feature coverage (20)
Largest vendor (5,000 employees)
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Mobile app, API access, Single sign-on (SSO) +6 more — offered by others here
No free plan
No free trial
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
|
Lacks Two-factor authentication, SOC 2, Integrations marketplace — offered by others here
No free plan
Cloud only
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
|
Lacks KVKK compliance (Turkey), Turkish interface, Workflow automation +1 more — offered by others here
No free plan
No free trial
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
|
Lacks KVKK compliance (Turkey), Turkish interface — offered by others here
No free trial
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
Least established — vendor founded 2019
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Compliant with Turkish payroll legislation
Integrates with Logo ERP products
Established local support network
|
Designed for Turkish HR regulations
Easy leave and personnel management
Turkish-language support
|
Simple, automated payroll for small businesses
Handles payroll tax filings
Benefits administration included
|
Hire and pay workers in many countries
EOR and contractor management in one platform
Handles local compliance and contracts
|
| Considerations |
On-premise setup requires IT maintenance
Interface feels dated
|
Mainly for the Turkish market
Limited global integrations
|
Available only for US businesses
Costs grow with headcount
Advanced HR features need higher tiers
|
Per-worker costs add up for larger teams
Support quality can vary by country
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | Contact for quote | Price not listed | $49 / month | $49 / contractor/month |
| Pricing model | Quote-based | Subscription | Subscription | Freemium |
| Free plan | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Free trial | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | On-premise | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Platforms | Windows | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Small business, Mid-market | Small business, Mid-market | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | — | — | — | — |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | — | 400K | 35K |
| Vendor employees | 923 | — | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| Headquarters | Gebze, Kocaeli, TR | İstanbul, TR | San Francisco, CA, US | San Francisco, CA, US |
| Founded | 1984 | 2016 | 2011 | 2019 |
| Categories | Payroll | HRIS, Payroll, Recruiting (ATS), Performance Management | HRIS, Payroll | HRIS, Payroll |
| Features | ||||
| Workflow automation | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| GDPR compliance | — | — | — | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | — | — | — | ✓ |
| KVKK compliance (Turkey) | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| SOC 2 | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom fields | — | ✓ | — | — |
| E-signature | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Expense tracking | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Multi-currency | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Payroll processing | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations marketplace | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webhooks | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Mobile app | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-language | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| Time tracking | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom reports | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dashboards | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit log | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.