Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Logo İşbaşı
Logo Yazılım
|
Paraşüt
Paraşüt
|
BizimHesap
BizimHesap
|
Xero
Xero
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Turkish interface
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Longest track record — vendor founded 1984
|
Turkish interface
|
Turkish interface
|
Only one here with Webhooks, Two-factor authentication, Audit log +4 more
Public pricing
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Broadest feature coverage (17)
Largest vendor (4,500 employees)
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks API access, Role-based access, Multi-currency +1 more — offered by others here
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
Smallest vendor (923 employees) — check support capacity
|
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
Least established — vendor founded 2013
|
Lacks Quotes & proposals, API access, Role-based access +2 more — offered by others here
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
Narrowest feature scope (11)
|
Lacks KVKK compliance (Turkey), Turkish interface, e-Invoice (Turkey) +3 more — offered by others here
No Turkish interface
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Simple cloud bookkeeping for small firms
E-invoice support for Turkish regulations
Backed by the Logo ecosystem
|
Integrated e-invoice and e-archive for Turkey
Easy to use for non-accountants
Works well with financial advisors
|
Combines bookkeeping and inventory tracking
Easy to learn for small businesses
E-invoice support for Turkey
|
Unlimited users on all plans
Clean interface with strong bank reconciliation
Large marketplace of integrations
|
| Considerations |
Limited features for larger businesses
Mainly for the Turkish market
|
Primarily for the Turkish market
Limited depth for complex operations
|
Limited for complex or multi-entity needs
Few international integrations
|
Lower plans limit invoice and bill volume
Payroll availability depends on region
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | Price not listed | Price not listed | Price not listed | $20 / month |
| Pricing model | Subscription | Subscription | Subscription | Subscription |
| Free plan | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Target size | Freelancer, Small business | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market | Freelancer, Small business | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market |
| Industries served | — | — | — | — |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | — | — | 4.4M |
| Vendor employees | 923 | — | — | 4,500 |
| Headquarters | Gebze, Kocaeli, TR | İstanbul, TR | TR | Wellington, NZ |
| Founded | 1984 | 2013 | — | 2006 |
| Categories | Accounting, Invoicing & Billing | Accounting, Invoicing & Billing | Accounting, Invoicing & Billing, Inventory Management | Accounting, Invoicing & Billing |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Workflow automation | — | — | — | ✓ |
| KVKK compliance (Turkey) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Marketplace integration | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Bank integration | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Expense tracking | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-currency | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Online payments | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Recurring billing | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| API access | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Integrations marketplace | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Webhooks | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Inventory tracking | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Custom reports | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dashboards | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Quotes & proposals | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| Audit log | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Role-based access | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | — | — | — | ✓ |
| e-Archive (Turkey) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| e-Invoice (Turkey) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.