Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Looker
Google
|
Microsoft Power BI
Microsoft
|
Tableau
Salesforce
|
ThoughtSpot
ThoughtSpot
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
Only one here with Turkish interface, Integrations marketplace
Free plan available
Can run on-premise
Turkish interface
Public pricing
|
Can run on-premise
Public pricing
Deloitte alliance partner
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Runs on the most platforms (5)
|
No relative advantage on tracked data |
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Mobile app, Self-hosted — offered by others here
No free plan
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
Pricing only on request
|
Lacks White label — offered by others here
|
Lacks White label — offered by others here
No free plan
No Turkish interface
Highest starting price here ($15 / user/month)
|
Lacks Self-hosted — offered by others here
No free plan
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
Pricing only on request
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Centralized semantic model keeps metrics consistent
Strong fit with Google Cloud and BigQuery
Embedding and API options for data products
|
Low entry cost for self-service BI
Deep integration with Excel and Microsoft 365
Large community and learning resources
|
Powerful, flexible data visualization
Strong community and visualization gallery
Connects to a wide range of data sources
|
Search-driven analytics for business users
AI-assisted insights on cloud data warehouses
Embeddable analytics for applications
|
| Considerations |
LookML modeling requires technical skills
Less suited to quick ad hoc analysis by beginners
|
DAX and data modeling have a learning curve
Desktop authoring is Windows-only
Capacity licensing gets costly at scale
|
Higher cost than many BI alternatives
Advanced analysis has a learning curve
Data preparation often needs separate tools
|
Requires well-modeled data to work well
Premium pricing for smaller teams
Less control over pixel-perfect reporting
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | Contact for quote | $14 / user/month | $15 / user/month | Price not listed |
| Pricing model | Quote-based | Freemium | Subscription | Subscription |
| Free plan | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Windows, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | — | — | Banking & capital markets, Healthcare, Retail & consumer, Government & public sector, Education, Cross-industry | — |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | — | — | — |
| Vendor employees | 183,000 | 228,000 | 76,000 | 800 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, US | Redmond, US | San Francisco, US | Mountain View, US |
| Founded | 1998 | 1975 | 1999 | 2012 |
| Categories | Business Intelligence (BI) | Business Intelligence (BI) | Business Intelligence (BI) | Business Intelligence (BI) |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SOC 2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| White label | ✓ | — | — | ✓ |
| Self-hosted | — | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations marketplace | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Mobile app | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-language | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turkish interface | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Custom reports | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dashboards | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit log | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.