Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Metabase
Metabase
|
Microsoft Power BI
Microsoft
|
Looker
Google
|
Snowflake
Snowflake
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Only one here with Open source
Free plan available
Open source
Can run on-premise
Turkish interface
|
Only one here with Mobile app, Integrations marketplace
Free plan available
Can run on-premise
Turkish interface
Public pricing
|
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
Deloitte alliance partner
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Two-factor authentication, ISO 27001, HIPAA — offered by others here
No public adoption figures
Highest starting price here ($100 / month)
Smallest vendor (150 employees) — check support capacity
Least established — vendor founded 2015
|
Lacks White label — offered by others here
No public adoption figures
|
Lacks Turkish interface, Self-hosted — offered by others here
No free plan
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
Pricing only on request
|
Lacks Turkish interface, Custom reports, Self-hosted +1 more — offered by others here
No free plan
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
Pricing only on request
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Open source and free to self-host
Very easy for non-technical users to ask questions
Quick setup with common databases
|
Low entry cost for self-service BI
Deep integration with Excel and Microsoft 365
Large community and learning resources
|
Centralized semantic model keeps metrics consistent
Strong fit with Google Cloud and BigQuery
Embedding and API options for data products
|
Separate storage and compute scale independently
Near-zero maintenance as a fully managed service
Strong data sharing and multi-cloud support
|
| Considerations |
Limited advanced visualization options
Governance features need paid plans
Can struggle with very complex data models
|
DAX and data modeling have a learning curve
Desktop authoring is Windows-only
Capacity licensing gets costly at scale
|
LookML modeling requires technical skills
Less suited to quick ad hoc analysis by beginners
|
Usage-based costs can be hard to predict and control
Requires governance to avoid runaway warehouse spend
No on-premise deployment option
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | $100 / month | $14 / user/month | Contact for quote | Price not listed |
| Pricing model | Open source | Freemium | Quote-based | Usage-based |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Windows, iOS, Android | Web | Web |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Small business, Mid-market | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | — | — | — | Banking & capital markets, Retail & consumer, Healthcare, Technology, media & telecom, Cross-industry |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | — | — | 11K |
| Vendor employees | 150 | 228,000 | 183,000 | 7,800 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, US | Redmond, US | Mountain View, US | Bozeman, US |
| Founded | 2015 | 1975 | 1998 | 2012 |
| Categories | Business Intelligence (BI) | Business Intelligence (BI) | Business Intelligence (BI) | Databases, Business Intelligence (BI) |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SOC 2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| White label | ✓ | — | ✓ | — |
| Open source | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Self-hosted | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations marketplace | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Mobile app | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Multi-language | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| Custom reports | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Dashboards | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit log | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.