Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
MongoDB Atlas
MongoDB
|
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL Global Development Group
|
Redis
Redis
|
Supabase
Supabase
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Only one here with Dashboards
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Largest vendor (5,000 employees)
|
Only one here with Multi-language, Turkish interface
Open source
Turkish interface
Longest track record — vendor founded 1996
|
Open source
Public pricing
Lowest starting price here ($5 / month)
|
Open source
Public pricing
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Self-hosted, Open source — offered by others here
No Turkish interface
Pricing only on request
|
Lacks API access, Webhooks, Single sign-on (SSO) +6 more — offered by others here
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
Narrowest feature scope (6)
|
Lacks Webhooks, HIPAA — offered by others here
No Turkish interface
No public adoption figures
|
Lacks ISO 27001 — offered by others here
No Turkish interface
No public adoption figures
Highest starting price here ($25 / month)
Smallest vendor (120 employees) — check support capacity
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Fully managed across major cloud providers
Flexible document data model
Built-in search, backups and scaling
|
Free, open source and standards-compliant
Rich features including JSON and extensions
Strong reliability and data integrity
|
Extremely fast in-memory reads and writes
Versatile data structures for caching, queues and sessions
Large ecosystem with client libraries for most languages
|
Full Postgres database with auth, storage and APIs built in
Generous free tier for prototypes and side projects
Open source with a self-hosting option
|
| Considerations |
Costs can grow quickly at scale
Less suited to complex relational workloads
Some advanced features limited to higher tiers
|
Tuning and administration require expertise
Horizontal scaling needs extra tooling
No official vendor support; relies on community or third parties
|
Memory-bound storage gets costly for large datasets
Persistence and clustering need careful configuration
Licensing changes may affect some self-hosted use cases
|
Self-hosting requires managing many moving parts
Costs can grow with compute and egress usage
Less suited to complex enterprise governance needs
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | Free plan available | Free | $5 / month | $25 / month |
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Open source | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | On-premise, Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise |
| Platforms | Web | Windows, macOS, Linux | Linux, macOS, Web | Web |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market |
| Industries served | — | — | — | — |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | 50K | — | — | — |
| Vendor employees | 5,000 | — | 900 | 120 |
| Headquarters | New York, US | — | Mountain View, US | San Francisco, US |
| Founded | 2009 | 1996 | 2009 | 2020 |
| Categories | Cloud Platforms, Databases | Databases | Databases | Databases, Low-Code / No-Code |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | ✓ | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | ✓ | — | — | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | — | ✓ | — |
| SOC 2 | ✓ | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Self-hosted | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webhooks | ✓ | — | — | ✓ |
| Multi-language | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Turkish interface | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Dashboards | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Audit log | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | ✓ | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | ✓ | — | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.