Compare

+ Open source

+ Deloitte alliance partner

+ Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure

+ Open source

+ Turkish interface

+ Only one here with AI features

+ Turkish interface

+ Deloitte alliance partner

+ Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure

+ Only one here with Custom reports

+ Turkish interface

+ Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure

+ Largest vendor (228,000 employees)

+ Longest track record — vendor founded 1975

− Lacks Turkish interface, GDPR compliance, SOC 2 +2 more — offered by others here

− No Turkish interface

− Narrowest feature scope (5)

− Lacks GDPR compliance, SOC 2, ISO 27001 +1 more — offered by others here

− Least established — vendor founded 1996

− Lacks Open source — offered by others here

− Lacks Open source — offered by others here

+ Widely supported by hosting providers and frameworks

+ Easy to set up and use

+ Large community and documentation

+ Free, open source and standards-compliant

+ Rich features including JSON and extensions

+ Strong reliability and data integrity

+ Proven for mission-critical enterprise workloads

+ Advanced high availability and security features

+ Multi-model support in one engine

+ Mature, reliable relational engine with strong tooling

+ Deep integration with Azure, Power BI and the Microsoft stack

+ Free editions available for development and small workloads

− Some advanced features lag behind PostgreSQL

− Enterprise tools require commercial licenses

− Horizontal scaling needs extra setup

− Tuning and administration require expertise

− Horizontal scaling needs extra tooling

− No official vendor support; relies on community or third parties

− Licensing is expensive and complex

− Requires specialized administration skills

− Enterprise licensing can become expensive at scale

− Core-based licensing model is complex to plan

− Some advanced features are reserved for top editions