Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
n8n
n8n
|
Zapier
Zapier
|
Make
Make (Celonis)
|
Jenkins
Linux Foundation
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Free trial available
Can run on-premise
Public pricing
Broadest feature coverage (14)
Most deployment options (Cloud (SaaS), On-premise)
|
Free trial available
Public pricing
Largest vendor (800 employees)
|
Only one here with ISO 27001
Public pricing
|
Only one here with Multi-language, Turkish interface, Open source
Open source
Can run on-premise
Turkish interface
Longest track record — vendor founded 2007
|
| Drawbacks |
No Turkish interface
Smallest vendor (200 employees) — check support capacity
Least established — vendor founded 2019
|
Lacks Self-hosted — offered by others here
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
|
Lacks Self-hosted, Chatbot — offered by others here
No free trial
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
|
Lacks Single sign-on (SSO), Two-factor authentication, GDPR compliance +4 more — offered by others here
No free trial
Pricing only on request
Narrowest feature scope (10)
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Can be self-hosted for full data control
Supports custom code and AI agent workflows
Fair-code model with an active community
|
Huge catalog of app integrations
Very easy for non-technical users to set up
Reliable for simple trigger-action workflows
|
Visual editor handles complex branching workflows
Generally cheaper per operation than many rivals
Detailed data mapping and error handling
|
Free and open source
Huge plugin ecosystem
Highly flexible pipelines as code
|
| Considerations |
Self-hosting requires technical maintenance
Interface is less beginner-friendly
Some enterprise features are limited to paid plans
|
Task-based pricing gets expensive at high volume
Complex multi-step logic can become unwieldy
Limited control compared to developer-focused tools
|
Steeper learning curve than simpler automation tools
Operation counting can be hard to estimate
Fewer native integrations than the largest competitors
|
Requires self-hosting and ongoing maintenance
Plugin compatibility issues can arise
Dated user interface
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | €20 / month | $19.99 / month | $9 / month | Free |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium | Freemium | Open source |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | On-premise |
| Platforms | Web | Web | Web | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Target size | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | — | — | — | — |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | — | — | — |
| Vendor employees | 200 | 800 | 500 | — |
| Headquarters | Berlin, DE | San Francisco, US | Prag, CZ | San Francisco, US |
| Founded | 2019 | 2012 | 2012 | 2007 |
| Categories | Automation & Integration (iPaaS) | Automation & Integration (iPaaS) | Automation & Integration (iPaaS) | DevOps & Version Control, Automation & Integration (iPaaS) |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Workflow automation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Chatbot | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| ISO 27001 | — | — | ✓ | — |
| SOC 2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Template library | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Open source | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Self-hosted | ✓ | — | — | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations marketplace | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webhooks | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-language | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Turkish interface | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Audit log | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Two-factor authentication | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.