comparare

Compare

Review up to 6 products side by side.

JSON
Nextcloud logo
Nextcloud
Nextcloud
Dropbox logo
Dropbox
Dropbox
Google Drive logo
Google Drive
Google
Microsoft OneDrive logo
Microsoft OneDrive
Microsoft
Head-to-head in this comparison
Advantages
Only one here with Calendar integration, Self-hosted, Open source +1 more
Open source
Can run on-premise
Turkish interface
Most deployment options (Cloud (SaaS), On-premise)
Only one here with Zapier integration, E-signature
Free trial available
Public pricing
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Broadest feature coverage (18)
Turkish interface
Public pricing
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Free trial available
Turkish interface
Public pricing
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Largest vendor (228,000 employees)
Drawbacks
Lacks SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA +2 more — offered by others here
No free trial
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
Smallest vendor (200 employees) — check support capacity
Lacks Turkish interface — offered by others here
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
Highest starting price here ($9.99 / month)
Lacks Webhooks, Integrations marketplace — offered by others here
No free trial
Cloud only
No public adoption figures
Lacks Webhooks, Integrations marketplace — offered by others here
Cloud only
No public adoption figures
Editorial assessment
Strengths
Self-hosted with full data sovereignty
Open source with a large app ecosystem
Combines files, calendar, chat and office tools
Fast, reliable file sync across devices
Easy sharing with external users
Integrates with many productivity apps
Generous free storage with a Google account
Real-time collaboration with Google Docs
Powerful search across files
Built into Windows and Microsoft 365
Co-authoring in Word, Excel and PowerPoint
Files on-demand saves local disk space
Considerations
Requires server administration and maintenance
Performance depends on hosting setup
Some apps vary in quality and maturity
Free plan offers limited storage
Costs more than storage bundled with office suites
Device limits on the free tier
Folder and permission management can get messy
Desktop sync is less flexible than some rivals
Privacy-sensitive teams may prefer other options
Sync issues reported with large libraries
Sharing settings can be confusing
Best experience within the Microsoft ecosystem
Product & company facts
Deloitte alliance ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕
Rating — — — —
Starting price Free $9.99 / month $1.99 / month $1.99 / month
Pricing model Open source Freemium Freemium Freemium
Free plan ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Free trial ✕ ✓ ✕ ✓
Open source ✓ ✕ ✕ ✕
Deployment Cloud (SaaS), On-premise Cloud (SaaS) Cloud (SaaS) Cloud (SaaS)
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android
Turkish interface ✓ ✕ ✓ ✓
Target size Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Industries served — — — —
Active users — — — —
Customers — 18M — —
Vendor employees 200 2,200 183,000 228,000
Headquarters Stuttgart, DE San Francisco, US Mountain View, US Redmond, US
Founded 2016 2007 1998 1975
Categories Team Communication, File Sharing & Storage File Sharing & Storage File Sharing & Storage File Sharing & Storage
Features
AI features — ✓ ✓ ✓
Video calls ✓ — — —
GDPR compliance ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
HIPAA — ✓ ✓ ✓
ISO 27001 — ✓ ✓ ✓
SOC 2 — ✓ ✓ ✓
Open source ✓ — — —
Self-hosted ✓ — — —
E-signature — ✓ — —
File versioning ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
API access ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Calendar integration ✓ — — —
Integrations marketplace ✓ ✓ — —
Webhooks ✓ ✓ — —
Zapier integration — ✓ — —
Mobile app ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Multi-language ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Offline mode — ✓ ✓ ✓
Turkish interface ✓ — ✓ ✓
Audit log ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Role-based access ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Single sign-on (SSO) ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Two-factor authentication ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.

Compare
Compare →