Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft
|
PingOne
Ping Identity
|
CyberArk Identity Security Platform
CyberArk
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Only one here with Integrations marketplace
Turkish interface
Public pricing
Deloitte alliance partner
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
Free plan available
Can run on-premise
Turkish interface
Public pricing
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
Can run on-premise
Deloitte alliance partner
|
Can run on-premise
|
| Drawbacks |
No free plan
Cloud only
Least established — vendor founded 2009
|
Lacks Webhooks — offered by others here
No public adoption figures
|
Lacks Turkish interface, Dashboards — offered by others here
No free plan
No Turkish interface
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
|
Lacks Mobile app, Webhooks, Turkish interface — offered by others here
No free plan
No Turkish interface
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Vendor-neutral SSO with a large app integration network
Robust MFA and lifecycle management
Reliable, user-friendly login experience
|
Native identity layer for Microsoft 365 and Azure
Conditional access and MFA included in many plans
|
Strong support for complex hybrid enterprise environments
Flexible federation and standards support
Covers workforce and customer identity
|
Comprehensive privileged access management capabilities
Strong session monitoring and credential vaulting
Suited to strict compliance requirements
|
| Considerations |
Costs add up as modules are added
Advanced features sold as separate products
Can be pricey for small organizations
|
Advanced features require premium licenses
Configuration can be complex in hybrid setups
Less neutral for non-Microsoft-centric stacks
|
Implementation requires specialized expertise
Admin experience can feel complex
|
Complex and lengthy implementation
Premium pricing aimed at large enterprises
Requires dedicated staff to operate well
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | $6 / user/month | $6 / user/month | Contact for quote | Contact for quote |
| Pricing model | Subscription | Freemium | Quote-based | Quote-based |
| Free plan | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS), Hybrid | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise, Hybrid | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise, Hybrid |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Industries served | Technology, media & telecom, Banking & capital markets, Healthcare, Government & public sector, Retail & consumer, Cross-industry | — | Banking & capital markets, Insurance, Healthcare, Government & public sector, Retail & consumer, Cross-industry | — |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | 19K | — | — | — |
| Vendor employees | 6,000 | 228,000 | 2,500 | 4,000 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, US | Redmond, US | Denver, US | Petah Tikva, IL |
| Founded | 2009 | 1975 | 2002 | 1999 |
| Categories | Identity & Access Management | Identity & Access Management | Identity & Access Management | Identity & Access Management, Password Managers |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Workflow automation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SOC 2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations marketplace | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Webhooks | ✓ | — | ✓ | — |
| Mobile app | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Multi-language | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| Dashboards | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Audit log | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.