Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Onapsis Platform
Onapsis
|
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable
|
Claroty xDome
Claroty
|
SafeBreach Exposure Validation Platform
SafeBreach
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Can run on-premise
|
Only one here with Two-factor authentication, AI features
Free trial available
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Broadest feature coverage (8)
Longest track record — vendor founded 2002
|
Can run on-premise
|
Can run on-premise
|
| Drawbacks |
No free trial
|
Lacks Workflow automation — offered by others here
Cloud only
|
Lacks Workflow automation, Custom reports — offered by others here
No free trial
Narrowest feature scope (5)
Least established — vendor founded 2015
|
No free trial
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Specialized security coverage for SAP landscapes
Combines vulnerability, threat detection and code checks
Supports compliance and audit reporting
|
Risk-based prioritization helps focus remediation
Broad asset and vulnerability coverage
Built on the widely used Nessus scanning engine
|
Deep visibility into OT and industrial assets
Understands many industrial protocols
Risk prioritization tailored to OT environments
|
Continuously validates security controls with simulations
Large library of attack scenarios
Helps prioritize remediation by real exposure
|
| Considerations |
Narrow focus mainly on SAP and similar business apps
Requires SAP security knowledge to tune effectively
|
Reporting customization can be limited
Licensing by asset can become costly at scale
Tuning needed in large, dynamic environments
|
Deployment across sites can be complex
Specialized focus may need separate IT tools
|
Requires security expertise to interpret results
Deployment of simulators across environments takes effort
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | Contact for quote | Contact for quote | Contact for quote | Contact for quote |
| Pricing model | Quote-based | Quote-based | Quote-based | Quote-based |
| Free plan | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Free trial | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise, Hybrid | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise, Hybrid |
| Platforms | Web | Web | Web | Web |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise | Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | Manufacturing & industrial, Energy, resources & utilities, Retail & consumer, Life sciences, Government & public sector, Cross-industry | Government & public sector, Banking & capital markets, Energy, resources & utilities, Manufacturing & industrial, Healthcare, Cross-industry | Manufacturing & industrial, Energy, resources & utilities, Healthcare, Life sciences, Real estate & construction | Banking & capital markets, Insurance, Healthcare, Technology, media & telecom, Cross-industry |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | — | — | — |
| Vendor employees | — | — | — | — |
| Headquarters | Boston, US | Columbia, US | New York, NY, US | Sunnyvale, US |
| Founded | 2009 | 2002 | 2015 | 2014 |
| Categories | Vulnerability & Exposure Management, Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) | Vulnerability & Exposure Management | Network & Cloud Security, Vulnerability & Exposure Management, GIS, IoT & Industrial | Vulnerability & Exposure Management |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Workflow automation | ✓ | — | — | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom reports | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Dashboards | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit log | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | — | ✓ | — | — |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.