Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Microsoft Power Automate
Microsoft
|
Zapier
Zapier
|
Make
Make (Celonis)
|
Workato
Workato
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Only one here with Mobile app, Multi-language, Turkish interface
Free trial available
Can run on-premise
Turkish interface
Public pricing
|
Free plan available
Free trial available
Public pricing
|
Free plan available
Public pricing
Lowest starting price here ($9 / month)
|
Free trial available
Deloitte alliance partner
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Chatbot — offered by others here
No free plan
|
Lacks ISO 27001, HIPAA — offered by others here
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
Highest starting price here ($19.99 / month)
|
Lacks HIPAA, Chatbot — offered by others here
No free trial
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
Smallest vendor (500 employees) — check support capacity
|
No free plan
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
Pricing only on request
Least established — vendor founded 2013
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Native automation across Microsoft 365 and Teams
Combines cloud flows with desktop RPA
Often included with existing Microsoft licenses
|
Huge catalog of app integrations
Very easy for non-technical users to set up
Reliable for simple trigger-action workflows
|
Visual editor handles complex branching workflows
Generally cheaper per operation than many rivals
Detailed data mapping and error handling
|
Enterprise-grade integrations and automation recipes
Strong governance, security and admin controls
Accessible to both IT and business teams
|
| Considerations |
Licensing for premium features is complex
Debugging complex flows can be frustrating
Weaker experience outside the Microsoft ecosystem
|
Task-based pricing gets expensive at high volume
Complex multi-step logic can become unwieldy
Limited control compared to developer-focused tools
|
Steeper learning curve than simpler automation tools
Operation counting can be hard to estimate
Fewer native integrations than the largest competitors
|
Pricing is high and only available on request
Overkill for small teams with simple needs
Advanced recipes still have a learning curve
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | $15 / user/month | $19.99 / month | $9 / month | Contact for quote |
| Pricing model | Subscription | Freemium | Freemium | Quote-based |
| Free plan | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Hybrid | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, iOS, Android | Web | Web | Web |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | — | — | — | Technology, media & telecom, Retail & consumer, Healthcare, Banking & capital markets, Professional services, Cross-industry |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | — | — | — |
| Vendor employees | 228,000 | 800 | 500 | 1,000 |
| Headquarters | Redmond, US | San Francisco, US | Prag, CZ | Mountain View, US |
| Founded | 1975 | 2012 | 2012 | 2013 |
| Categories | Low-Code / No-Code, Automation & Integration (iPaaS) | Automation & Integration (iPaaS) | Automation & Integration (iPaaS) | Automation & Integration (iPaaS) |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Workflow automation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Chatbot | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | ✓ | — | — | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| SOC 2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Template library | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations marketplace | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webhooks | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Multi-language | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Audit log | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.