Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat
|
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Amazon
|
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft
|
Google Cloud
Google
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Only one here with Self-hosted, Open source
Free trial available
Open source
Deloitte alliance partner
Most deployment options (Cloud (SaaS), On-premise, Hybrid)
|
Free plan available
Turkish interface
Deloitte alliance partner
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Largest vendor (1,550,000 employees)
|
Free plan available
Turkish interface
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Longest track record — vendor founded 1975
|
Free plan available
Free trial available
Turkish interface
Deloitte alliance partner
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Mobile app, Webhooks, Two-factor authentication +7 more — offered by others here
No free plan
No Turkish interface
Narrowest feature scope (7)
Smallest vendor (19,000 employees) — check support capacity
|
No free trial
|
No free trial
|
Least established — vendor founded 1998
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Enterprise-supported Kubernetes with integrated tooling
Consistent platform across hybrid and multi-cloud
Strong security defaults and developer workflows
|
Broadest range of cloud services
Global infrastructure footprint
Mature ecosystem and documentation
|
Strong integration with Microsoft tools and identity
Robust hybrid cloud capabilities
Broad enterprise compliance coverage
|
Strong data analytics and AI services
Developer-friendly Kubernetes offerings
Sustained-use and flexible pricing options
|
| Considerations |
Operational complexity requires skilled teams
Subscription costs can be high at scale
More opinionated than upstream Kubernetes
|
Pricing is complex and hard to forecast
Steep learning curve across services
Console and service sprawl can overwhelm
|
Pricing can be complex to estimate
Portal and documentation can be confusing
Learning curve for non-Microsoft teams
|
Smaller service catalog than the largest rival
Enterprise support can be costly
Some services change or are retired over time
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | Price not listed | Free plan available | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Pricing model | Subscription | Usage-based | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Free plan | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise, Hybrid | Cloud (SaaS), Hybrid | Cloud (SaaS), Hybrid | Cloud (SaaS), Hybrid |
| Platforms | Web, Linux | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | Banking & capital markets, Government & public sector, Technology, media & telecom, Healthcare, Manufacturing & industrial, Cross-industry | Cross-industry, Government & public sector, Banking & capital markets, Healthcare, Technology, media & telecom, Retail & consumer | — | Retail & consumer, Banking & capital markets, Healthcare, Technology, media & telecom, Government & public sector, Cross-industry |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | — | — | — |
| Vendor employees | 19,000 | 1,550,000 | 228,000 | 183,000 |
| Headquarters | Raleigh, US | Seattle, US | Redmond, US | Mountain View, US |
| Founded | 1993 | 1994 | 1975 | 1998 |
| Categories | DevOps & Version Control, Cloud Platforms | Cloud Platforms, Databases | Cloud Platforms, Databases | Cloud Platforms, Databases |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| GDPR compliance | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SOC 2 | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Self-hosted | ✓ | — | — | — |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webhooks | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-language | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turkish interface | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dashboards | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit log | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.