Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
RelativityOne
Relativity
|
Legora
Legora
|
CoCounsel
Thomson Reuters
|
Conga CLM
Conga
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Only one here with Two-factor authentication, Custom reports, Dashboards
Broadest feature coverage (11)
Longest track record — vendor founded 2001
|
Only one here with GDPR compliance
|
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Largest vendor (24,000 employees)
|
Only one here with File versioning, E-signature
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Template library — offered by others here
|
Lacks API access, Audit log, Workflow automation — offered by others here
Least established — vendor founded 2023
|
Lacks API access, Role-based access, Audit log +3 more — offered by others here
Narrowest feature scope (3)
|
Lacks SOC 2, ISO 27001, AI features — offered by others here
Smallest vendor (1,500 employees) — check support capacity
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Comprehensive e-discovery review and analytics
Large ecosystem of partners and extensions
Cloud delivery reduces infrastructure management
|
Collaborative workspace designed for legal teams
Handles bulk document review and drafting tasks
Modern, approachable user experience
|
Generative AI tailored to legal and tax workflows
Draws on trusted professional content sources
Speeds up document review and summarization
|
Native integration with Salesforce
Configurable contract workflows and approvals
Clause library and document generation
|
| Considerations |
Learning curve for administrators and reviewers
Costs can rise with data volume
|
AI outputs still require careful lawyer verification
Relatively young product with an evolving feature set
|
Outputs still require professional review
Best value when paired with other Thomson Reuters products
Pricing details vary by bundle
|
Setup and configuration can be lengthy
Best value for Salesforce-centric organizations
Interface can feel complex for occasional users
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | Contact for quote | Contact for quote | Price not listed | Contact for quote |
| Pricing model | Quote-based | Quote-based | Subscription | Quote-based |
| Free plan | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Free trial | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Platforms | Web | Web | Web | Web |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | Professional services, Government & public sector, Banking & capital markets, Insurance, Cross-industry | Professional services, Banking & capital markets, Cross-industry | Professional services, Government & public sector, Banking & capital markets, Technology, media & telecom, Cross-industry | Technology, media & telecom, Life sciences, Manufacturing & industrial, Cross-industry |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | — | — | — |
| Vendor employees | — | — | 24,000 | 1,500 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, US | Stockholm, SE | Toronto, CA | Broomfield, CO, US |
| Founded | 2001 | 2023 | 2008 | 2006 |
| Categories | Legal & Contract Management | AI Assistants, Legal & Contract Management | AI Assistants, Legal & Contract Management | Document & Content Management, Legal & Contract Management |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Workflow automation | ✓ | — | — | ✓ |
| GDPR compliance | — | ✓ | — | — |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| SOC 2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Template library | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| E-signature | — | — | — | ✓ |
| File versioning | — | — | — | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | — | — | ✓ |
| Custom reports | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Dashboards | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Audit log | ✓ | — | — | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | ✓ | — | — | — |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.