comparare

Compare

Review up to 6 products side by side.

JSON
Rocket.Chat logo
Rocket.Chat
Rocket.Chat
Slack logo
Slack
Salesforce
Mattermost logo
Mattermost
Mattermost
Zoom Workplace logo
Zoom Workplace
Zoom Communications
Head-to-head in this comparison
Advantages
Only one here with Omnichannel
Free trial available
Open source
Can run on-premise
Turkish interface
Only one here with Zapier integration, Email integration
Free trial available
Public pricing
Deloitte alliance partner
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Free trial available
Open source
Can run on-premise
Turkish interface
Public pricing
Turkish interface
Public pricing
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Drawbacks
Lacks SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA +4 more — offered by others here
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
Narrowest feature scope (15)
Smallest vendor (150 employees) — check support capacity
Lacks Turkish interface, Self-hosted, Open source — offered by others here
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
No public adoption figures
Lacks SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA +1 more — offered by others here
No public adoption figures
Lacks Self-hosted, Open source, Workflow automation — offered by others here
No free trial
Cloud only
Highest starting price here ($13.33 / user/month)
Editorial assessment
Strengths
Open source and self-hostable
Highly customizable and white-label options
Omnichannel features for customer messaging
Intuitive channel-based messaging
Huge ecosystem of integrations and bots
Strong search and workflow automation
Self-hosting gives full control over data
Open source and extensible
Suited to regulated and security-sensitive teams
Reliable, high-quality video meetings
Easy for external participants to join
Webinars, chat and phone in one platform
Considerations
Self-hosted setup and upgrades take effort
User experience less polished than leading SaaS tools
Advanced features require paid editions
Free plan has limited message history
Can become noisy and distracting
Per-user cost adds up for large teams
Self-hosting requires operational effort
Smaller integration ecosystem than Slack
Some enterprise features are paid only
Free plan has meeting time limits
Add-ons like webinars cost extra
Extra apps beyond meetings are less mature
Product & company facts
Deloitte alliance ✕ ✓ ✕ ✕
Rating — — — —
Starting price Free $7.25 / user/month $10 / user/month $13.33 / user/month
Pricing model Open source Freemium Open source Freemium
Free plan ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Free trial ✓ ✓ ✓ ✕
Open source ✓ ✕ ✓ ✕
Deployment Cloud (SaaS), On-premise Cloud (SaaS) Cloud (SaaS), On-premise Cloud (SaaS)
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android
Turkish interface ✓ ✕ ✓ ✓
Target size Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Industries served — Banking & capital markets, Healthcare, Retail & consumer, Manufacturing & industrial, Government & public sector, Cross-industry — —
Active users — — — —
Customers — — — 192K
Vendor employees 150 76,000 — 7,400
Headquarters Porto Alegre, BR San Francisco, US Palo Alto, US San Jose, US
Founded 2015 1999 2015 2011
Categories Team Communication Team Communication Team Communication Team Communication, Video Conferencing
Features
AI features — ✓ ✓ ✓
Workflow automation — ✓ ✓ —
Omnichannel ✓ — — —
Screen sharing — ✓ ✓ ✓
Video calls ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
GDPR compliance ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
HIPAA — ✓ — ✓
ISO 27001 — ✓ — ✓
SOC 2 — ✓ — ✓
Open source ✓ — ✓ —
Self-hosted ✓ — ✓ —
API access ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Calendar integration — ✓ — ✓
Email integration — ✓ — —
Integrations marketplace ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Webhooks ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Zapier integration — ✓ — —
Mobile app ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Multi-language ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Turkish interface ✓ — ✓ ✓
Audit log ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Role-based access ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Single sign-on (SSO) ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Two-factor authentication ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.

Compare
Compare →