Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
signNow
airSlate
|
Docusign eSignature
Docusign
|
Dropbox Sign
Dropbox
|
Zoho Sign
Zoho Corporation
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Public pricing
Lowest starting price here ($8 / user/month)
|
Only one here with ISO 27001, AI features
Public pricing
Deloitte alliance partner
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Broadest feature coverage (17)
|
Only one here with White label
Public pricing
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
Free plan available
Largest vendor (18,000 employees)
Longest track record — vendor founded 1996
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Integrations marketplace — offered by others here
No free plan
No public adoption figures
Smallest vendor (800 employees) — check support capacity
|
No free plan
|
Lacks Mobile app, Role-based access — offered by others here
No free plan
No public adoption figures
Highest starting price here ($15 / month)
Least established — vendor founded 2007
|
Lacks Single sign-on (SSO), HIPAA, Zapier integration +1 more — offered by others here
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
Narrowest feature scope (11)
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Affordable compared to major competitors
Templates, bulk send and workflow tools
Easy to use for basic signing
|
Widely recognized and accepted by signers
Extensive integrations and API
Robust audit trails and templates
|
Simple, clean signing experience
Developer-friendly signature API
Integrates with Dropbox and Google Workspace
|
Affordable with a free tier
Integrates with Zoho CRM and other Zoho apps
Supports common compliance standards
|
| Considerations |
Interface less polished than leading tools
Fewer native integrations
Advanced features spread across plans
|
Higher price than many alternatives
Envelope limits on lower plans
Advanced features require costly tiers
|
Fewer advanced workflow features than leaders
Template and user limits on lower plans
API pricing separate from app plans
|
Fewer third-party integrations than leaders
Interface less polished than top rivals
Best value within the Zoho ecosystem
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | $8 / user/month | $10 / month | $15 / month | Free plan available |
| Pricing model | Subscription | Subscription | Subscription | Freemium |
| Free plan | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market | Small business, Mid-market |
| Industries served | — | Banking & capital markets, Insurance, Real estate & construction, Life sciences, Government & public sector, Cross-industry | — | — |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | 1.5M | — | — |
| Vendor employees | 800 | 6,800 | 2,200 | 18,000 |
| Headquarters | Boston, US | San Francisco, US | San Francisco, US | Chennai, IN |
| Founded | — | 2003 | 2007 | 1996 |
| Categories | E-Signature | E-Signature | E-Signature | E-Signature |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | — | ✓ | — | — |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| ISO 27001 | — | ✓ | — | — |
| SOC 2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Template library | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| White label | — | — | ✓ | — |
| E-signature | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations marketplace | — | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Webhooks | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Zapier integration | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Mobile app | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Multi-language | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit log | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Two-factor authentication | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.