comparare

Compare

Review up to 6 products side by side.

JSON
Slack logo
Slack
Salesforce
Microsoft Teams logo
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft
Google Workspace logo
Mattermost logo
Mattermost
Mattermost
Head-to-head in this comparison
Advantages
Only one here with Zapier integration
Free plan available
Deloitte alliance partner
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Free plan available
Turkish interface
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Lowest starting price here ($4 / user/month)
Broadest feature coverage (21)
Only one here with Offline mode
Turkish interface
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Only one here with Self-hosted, Open source
Free plan available
Open source
Can run on-premise
Turkish interface
Drawbacks
Lacks Turkish interface, File versioning — offered by others here
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
No public adoption figures
Smallest vendor (76,000 employees) — check support capacity
Cloud only
Lacks Webhooks, Workflow automation — offered by others here
No free plan
Cloud only
No public adoption figures
Lacks SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA +3 more — offered by others here
No public adoption figures
Highest starting price here ($10 / user/month)
Narrowest feature scope (17)
Least established — vendor founded 2015
Editorial assessment
Strengths
Intuitive channel-based messaging
Huge ecosystem of integrations and bots
Strong search and workflow automation
Deep integration with Microsoft 365 apps
Chat, meetings and file collaboration in one place
Often included in existing Microsoft licenses
Real-time collaboration in Docs, Sheets and Slides
Reliable Gmail and simple administration
Works fully in the browser on any device
Self-hosting gives full control over data
Open source and extensible
Suited to regulated and security-sensitive teams
Considerations
Free plan has limited message history
Can become noisy and distracting
Per-user cost adds up for large teams
Interface can feel cluttered
Can be resource-heavy on desktop
Less appealing outside the Microsoft ecosystem
Advanced spreadsheet features lag behind Excel
Offline use is limited
Storage and security features vary by plan
Self-hosting requires operational effort
Smaller integration ecosystem than Slack
Some enterprise features are paid only
Product & company facts
Deloitte alliance ✓ ✕ ✕ ✕
Rating — — — —
Starting price $7.25 / user/month $4 / user/month $7 / user/month $10 / user/month
Pricing model Freemium Freemium Subscription Open source
Free plan ✓ ✓ ✕ ✓
Free trial ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Open source ✕ ✕ ✕ ✓
Deployment Cloud (SaaS) Cloud (SaaS) Cloud (SaaS) Cloud (SaaS), On-premise
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android Web, iOS, Android Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android
Turkish interface ✕ ✓ ✓ ✓
Target size Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Industries served Banking & capital markets, Healthcare, Retail & consumer, Manufacturing & industrial, Government & public sector, Cross-industry — — —
Active users — 320M — —
Customers — — — —
Vendor employees 76,000 228,000 183,000 —
Headquarters San Francisco, US Redmond, US Mountain View, US Palo Alto, US
Founded 1999 1975 1998 2015
Categories Team Communication Team Communication, Video Conferencing Team Communication, Video Conferencing, File Sharing & Storage Team Communication
Features
AI features ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Workflow automation ✓ ✓ — ✓
Screen sharing ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Video calls ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
GDPR compliance ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
HIPAA ✓ ✓ ✓ —
ISO 27001 ✓ ✓ ✓ —
SOC 2 ✓ ✓ ✓ —
Open source — — — ✓
Self-hosted — — — ✓
File versioning — ✓ ✓ —
API access ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Calendar integration ✓ ✓ ✓ —
Email integration ✓ ✓ ✓ —
Integrations marketplace ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Webhooks ✓ ✓ — ✓
Zapier integration ✓ — — —
Mobile app ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Multi-language ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Offline mode — — ✓ —
Turkish interface — ✓ ✓ ✓
Audit log ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Role-based access ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Single sign-on (SSO) ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Two-factor authentication ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.

Compare
Compare →