Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
S
Smart 3D
Octave (formerly Intergraph / Hexagon ALI & SIG)
|
AVEVA E3D Design
AVEVA
|
3DEXPERIENCE
Dassault Systèmes
|
CATIA
Dassault Systèmes
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Deloitte alliance partner
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
Deloitte alliance partner
Longest track record — vendor founded 1967
|
Only one here with API access, Single sign-on (SSO), Audit log +1 more
Deloitte alliance partner
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Broadest feature coverage (7)
|
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Multi-language — offered by others here
|
Lacks Multi-language — offered by others here
|
No relative drawback on tracked data |
Lacks Role-based access — offered by others here
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Rule-based design automation for plant and marine projects
Strong support for large, multi-discipline models
Integrates with related engineering and data tools
|
Detailed 3D plant modeling and clash detection
Supports multi-discipline engineering collaboration
Widely used in process and marine industries
|
Connects design, simulation and manufacturing data
Strong collaboration across engineering teams
Broad portfolio of integrated applications
|
Advanced surface and complex assembly modeling
Industry standard in aerospace and automotive
Strong systems engineering capabilities
|
| Considerations |
Requires significant training and administration
Licensing and infrastructure costs suit large projects
|
Steep learning curve for new designers
High licensing cost
Demanding hardware and admin requirements
|
Complex to deploy and administer
Steep learning curve for new users
High licensing cost
|
Very steep learning curve
High licensing and training costs
Demanding hardware requirements
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | Contact for quote | Contact for quote | Contact for quote | Contact for quote |
| Pricing model | Quote-based | Quote-based | Quote-based | Quote-based |
| Free plan | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Free trial | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | On-premise, Cloud (SaaS) | On-premise, Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | On-premise, Cloud (SaaS) |
| Platforms | Windows | Windows | Web, Windows | Windows |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Enterprise | Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Industries served | Energy, resources & utilities, Manufacturing & industrial, Government & public sector, Real estate & construction, Transportation & logistics | Energy, resources & utilities, Manufacturing & industrial, Life sciences, Transportation & logistics | Manufacturing & industrial, Automotive, Life sciences, Real estate & construction, Transportation & logistics | Manufacturing & industrial, Automotive, Life sciences, Real estate & construction, Transportation & logistics |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | — | — | — |
| Vendor employees | 7,200 | — | — | — |
| Headquarters | Madison, AL, US | Cambridge, GB | Vélizy-Villacoublay, FR | Vélizy-Villacoublay, FR |
| Founded | 1969 | 1967 | 1981 | 1981 |
| Categories | PLM, CAD & Engineering | PLM, CAD & Engineering | PLM, CAD & Engineering | Design Tools, PLM, CAD & Engineering |
| Features | ||||
| File versioning | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Multi-language | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dashboards | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Audit log | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | — | — | ✓ | — |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.