Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
WordPress.com
Automattic
|
Wix
Wix
|
Squarespace
Squarespace
|
WordPress
WordPress Foundation
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Free plan available
Turkish interface
Public pricing
Lowest starting price here ($4 / month)
|
Only one here with Single sign-on (SSO), SOC 2, ISO 27001
Free plan available
Turkish interface
Public pricing
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
Free trial available
Public pricing
Longest track record — vendor founded 2004
|
Only one here with Webhooks, Self-hosted, Open source
Free plan available
Open source
Can run on-premise
Turkish interface
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks API access, Online payments — offered by others here
No free trial
Cloud only
No public adoption figures
Smallest vendor (940 employees) — check support capacity
|
No free trial
Cloud only
Highest starting price here ($17 / month)
|
Lacks Turkish interface, Integrations marketplace — offered by others here
No free plan
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
|
Lacks Two-factor authentication, GDPR compliance, AI features +1 more — offered by others here
No free trial
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
Least established — vendor founded 2010
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Managed hosting with no server maintenance
Familiar WordPress editor and themes
Free plan to get started quickly
|
Easy drag-and-drop editor
Large selection of templates and apps
Hosting, domains and ecommerce in one place
|
Polished, design-focused templates out of the box
All-in-one hosting, domains and ecommerce
Easy drag-and-drop editing for non-technical users
|
Free, open-source and self-hostable
Huge ecosystem of themes and plugins
Large community and talent pool
|
| Considerations |
Plugins and custom themes require higher plans
Less control than self-hosted WordPress
Free sites show platform branding and ads
|
Switching templates later is difficult
Free plan shows Wix branding
Less flexible for complex or large sites
|
Limited flexibility for custom layouts and code
Smaller app and integration ecosystem than rivals
Ecommerce features less advanced for large catalogs
|
Requires ongoing updates and maintenance
Plugin sprawl can hurt performance
Hosting, security and backups are your responsibility
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | $4 / month | $17 / month | $16 / month | Free |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium | Subscription | Open source |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Free trial | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | On-premise, Cloud (SaaS) |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Target size | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market | Freelancer, Small business | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | — | — | — | — |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | 6M | 5M | — |
| Vendor employees | 940 | 5,929 | 1,750 | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, US | Tel Aviv, IL | New York, US | San Francisco, US |
| Founded | 2005 | 2006 | 2004 | 2010 |
| Categories | Website Builders, Content Management (CMS) | E-Commerce Platforms, Website Builders | E-Commerce Platforms, Website Builders | Website Builders, Content Management (CMS) |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| ISO 27001 | — | ✓ | — | — |
| SOC 2 | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Template library | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Self-hosted | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Online payments | — | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| API access | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations marketplace | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Webhooks | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Mobile app | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-language | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Two-factor authentication | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.