Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Yousign
Yousign
|
Docusign eSignature
Docusign
|
Dropbox Sign
Dropbox
|
Box
Box
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages | No relative advantage on tracked data |
Public pricing
Deloitte alliance partner
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Lowest starting price here ($10 / month)
Largest customer base (1.5M)
|
Only one here with White label
Public pricing
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
Only one here with Workflow automation, File versioning
Free plan available
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Runs on the most platforms (5)
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Mobile app, Single sign-on (SSO), Role-based access +5 more — offered by others here
No free plan
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
Narrowest feature scope (9)
|
No free plan
|
Lacks ISO 27001, Mobile app, Role-based access +1 more — offered by others here
No free plan
No public adoption figures
Highest starting price here ($15 / month)
|
Lacks Template library, Zapier integration — offered by others here
Pricing only on request
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
eIDAS-compliant signatures for European businesses
Simple interface for quick signing
API available for developers
|
Widely recognized and accepted by signers
Extensive integrations and API
Robust audit trails and templates
|
Simple, clean signing experience
Developer-friendly signature API
Integrates with Dropbox and Google Workspace
|
Strong security, governance and compliance controls
Granular permissions for enterprise content
Wide integration ecosystem
|
| Considerations |
Fewer integrations than global leaders
Mainly focused on the European market
Advanced signature levels cost extra
|
Higher price than many alternatives
Envelope limits on lower plans
Advanced features require costly tiers
|
Fewer advanced workflow features than leaders
Template and user limits on lower plans
API pricing separate from app plans
|
Can be costly for small teams
Interface less intuitive than consumer tools
Advanced features require higher plans
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | Price not listed | $10 / month | $15 / month | Free plan available |
| Pricing model | Subscription | Subscription | Subscription | Freemium |
| Free plan | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android | Web | Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | — | Banking & capital markets, Insurance, Real estate & construction, Life sciences, Government & public sector, Cross-industry | — | — |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | 1.5M | — | 115K |
| Vendor employees | 400 | 6,800 | 2,200 | 2,800 |
| Headquarters | Paris, FR | San Francisco, US | San Francisco, US | Redwood City, US |
| Founded | 2013 | 2003 | 2007 | 2005 |
| Categories | E-Signature | E-Signature | E-Signature | File Sharing & Storage, E-Signature |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Workflow automation | — | — | — | ✓ |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| SOC 2 | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Template library | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| White label | — | — | ✓ | — |
| E-signature | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| File versioning | — | — | — | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations marketplace | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webhooks | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Zapier integration | — | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Mobile app | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Multi-language | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit log | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.