comparare

Compare

Review up to 6 products side by side.

JSON
Zoho Cliq logo
Zoho Cliq
Zoho Corporation
Slack logo
Slack
Salesforce
Microsoft Teams logo
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft
Zoom Workplace logo
Zoom Workplace
Zoom Communications
Head-to-head in this comparison
Advantages
Only one here with Chatbot
Free trial available
Only one here with Zapier integration
Free trial available
Public pricing
Deloitte alliance partner
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Only one here with File versioning
Free trial available
Turkish interface
Public pricing
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Turkish interface
Public pricing
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Drawbacks
Lacks Audit log, SOC 2, ISO 27001 +5 more — offered by others here
No Turkish interface
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
Narrowest feature scope (13)
Lacks Turkish interface — offered by others here
No Turkish interface
No public adoption figures
No relative drawback on tracked data
Lacks Workflow automation, Email integration — offered by others here
No free trial
Highest starting price here ($13.33 / user/month)
Smallest vendor (7,400 employees) — check support capacity
Least established — vendor founded 2011
Editorial assessment
Strengths
Affordable team chat with a free tier
Integrates tightly with other Zoho apps
Bots and automation for routine tasks
Intuitive channel-based messaging
Huge ecosystem of integrations and bots
Strong search and workflow automation
Deep integration with Microsoft 365 apps
Chat, meetings and file collaboration in one place
Often included in existing Microsoft licenses
Reliable, high-quality video meetings
Easy for external participants to join
Webinars, chat and phone in one platform
Considerations
Smaller third-party integration ecosystem
Less familiar to users outside Zoho
Interface can feel less polished than rivals
Free plan has limited message history
Can become noisy and distracting
Per-user cost adds up for large teams
Interface can feel cluttered
Can be resource-heavy on desktop
Less appealing outside the Microsoft ecosystem
Free plan has meeting time limits
Add-ons like webinars cost extra
Extra apps beyond meetings are less mature
Product & company facts
Deloitte alliance ✕ ✓ ✕ ✕
Rating — — — —
Starting price Free plan available $7.25 / user/month $4 / user/month $13.33 / user/month
Pricing model Freemium Freemium Freemium Freemium
Free plan ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Free trial ✓ ✓ ✓ ✕
Open source ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕
Deployment Cloud (SaaS) Cloud (SaaS) Cloud (SaaS) Cloud (SaaS)
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android
Turkish interface ✕ ✕ ✓ ✓
Target size Small business, Mid-market Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Industries served — Banking & capital markets, Healthcare, Retail & consumer, Manufacturing & industrial, Government & public sector, Cross-industry — —
Active users — — 320M —
Customers — — — 192K
Vendor employees 18,000 76,000 228,000 7,400
Headquarters Chennai, IN San Francisco, US Redmond, US San Jose, US
Founded 1996 1999 1975 2011
Categories Team Communication Team Communication Team Communication, Video Conferencing Team Communication, Video Conferencing
Features
AI features — ✓ ✓ ✓
Workflow automation ✓ ✓ ✓ —
Chatbot ✓ — — —
Screen sharing ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Video calls ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
GDPR compliance ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
HIPAA — ✓ ✓ ✓
ISO 27001 — ✓ ✓ ✓
SOC 2 — ✓ ✓ ✓
File versioning — — ✓ —
API access ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Calendar integration — ✓ ✓ ✓
Email integration — ✓ ✓ —
Integrations marketplace ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Webhooks ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Zapier integration — ✓ — —
Mobile app ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Multi-language ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Turkish interface — — ✓ ✓
Audit log — ✓ ✓ ✓
Role-based access ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Single sign-on (SSO) ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Two-factor authentication ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.

Compare
Compare →