Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Tenable Nessus
Tenable
|
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable
|
Wiz
Google
|
Claroty xDome
Claroty
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Only one here with Self-hosted, Template library
Free plan available
Free trial available
Can run on-premise
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
Only one here with Two-factor authentication
Free trial available
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
Only one here with SOC 2, Workflow automation
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Broadest feature coverage (9)
Longest track record — vendor founded 1998
|
Can run on-premise
Most deployment options (Cloud (SaaS), On-premise)
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Single sign-on (SSO), Role-based access, Audit log +1 more — offered by others here
|
No free plan
Cloud only
|
No free plan
No free trial
Cloud only
|
Lacks Custom reports, AI features — offered by others here
No free plan
No free trial
Least established — vendor founded 2015
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Widely adopted scanner with extensive plugin coverage
Straightforward to install and run
Free edition available for limited use
|
Risk-based prioritization helps focus remediation
Broad asset and vulnerability coverage
Built on the widely used Nessus scanning engine
|
Agentless deployment gives fast visibility
Security graph contextualizes risk across clouds
Intuitive interface valued by security teams
|
Deep visibility into OT and industrial assets
Understands many industrial protocols
Risk prioritization tailored to OT environments
|
| Considerations |
Limited centralized management in standalone editions
Scans can produce many findings that need triage
Enterprise features require other Tenable products
|
Reporting customization can be limited
Licensing by asset can become costly at scale
Tuning needed in large, dynamic environments
|
Premium pricing for broad cloud coverage
Runtime protection may need additional components
|
Deployment across sites can be complex
Specialized focus may need separate IT tools
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | Free plan available | Contact for quote | Contact for quote | Contact for quote |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Quote-based | Quote-based | Quote-based |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | On-premise | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux, Web | Web | Web | Web |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Industries served | Government & public sector, Banking & capital markets, Energy, resources & utilities, Manufacturing & industrial, Healthcare, Cross-industry | Government & public sector, Banking & capital markets, Energy, resources & utilities, Manufacturing & industrial, Healthcare, Cross-industry | Technology, media & telecom, Banking & capital markets, Retail & consumer, Healthcare, Cross-industry | Manufacturing & industrial, Energy, resources & utilities, Healthcare, Life sciences, Real estate & construction |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | — | — | — |
| Vendor employees | — | — | 183,000 | — |
| Headquarters | Columbia, US | Columbia, US | Mountain View, US | New York, NY, US |
| Founded | 2002 | 2002 | 1998 | 2015 |
| Categories | Vulnerability & Exposure Management | Vulnerability & Exposure Management | Network & Cloud Security, Vulnerability & Exposure Management | Network & Cloud Security, Vulnerability & Exposure Management, GIS, IoT & Industrial |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | — | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Workflow automation | — | — | ✓ | — |
| SOC 2 | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Template library | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Self-hosted | ✓ | — | — | — |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom reports | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Dashboards | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit log | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | — | ✓ | — | — |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.