Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Odoo
Odoo
|
Zoho One
Zoho Corporation
|
SAP Business One
SAP
|
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Microsoft
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Only one here with Quotes & proposals, Time tracking, Gantt charts +3 more
Free plan available
Free trial available
Open source
Can run on-premise
|
Only one here with Email integration, Calendar integration, Expense tracking +1 more
Free trial available
Public pricing
Broadest feature coverage (25)
|
Can run on-premise
Deloitte alliance partner
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Longest track record — vendor founded 1972
|
Only one here with Integrations marketplace
Free trial available
Can run on-premise
Public pricing
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Webhooks, Single sign-on (SSO), Two-factor authentication +2 more — offered by others here
Smallest vendor (5,000 employees) — check support capacity
Least established — vendor founded 2004
|
Lacks Bank integration — offered by others here
No free plan
Cloud only
No public adoption figures
|
Lacks Mobile app, Audit log, GDPR compliance +10 more — offered by others here
No free plan
No free trial
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
|
Lacks Custom fields, Pipeline management, Recurring billing — offered by others here
No free plan
No public adoption figures
Highest starting price here ($80 / user/month)
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Modular apps that grow with the business
Open-source core with a large community
Wide functional coverage
|
Large suite of business apps under one license
Strong value compared to buying apps separately
Shared data and single sign-on across apps
|
Integrated ERP for small and mid-sized firms
Large global partner network
Covers finance, sales, inventory and CRM
|
Deep integration with Microsoft 365
Extensible via a large app marketplace
Covers finance, sales and operations
|
| Considerations |
Customizations can complicate upgrades
Quality of community modules varies
Implementation partner quality varies
|
Breadth can be overwhelming to roll out
Quality and depth vary between apps
Integrating with non-Zoho tools can take effort
|
Customization usually requires a partner
Interface feels dated
|
Usually needs a partner for setup
Customization can add cost
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | $24.90 / user/month | $37 / employee/month | Contact for quote | $80 / user/month |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Subscription | Quote-based | Subscription |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, macOS | Web, Windows, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, iOS, Android |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Target size | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market | Small business, Mid-market | Small business, Mid-market |
| Industries served | — | — | Manufacturing & industrial, Retail & consumer, Energy, resources & utilities, Life sciences, Automotive, Cross-industry | — |
| Active users | 12M | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | — | — | — |
| Vendor employees | 5,000 | 18,000 | 108,000 | 228,000 |
| Headquarters | Grand-Rosière, BE | Chennai, IN | Walldorf, DE | Redmond, US |
| Founded | 2004 | 1996 | 1972 | 1975 |
| Categories | CRM, Accounting, Invoicing & Billing, ERP, Inventory Management | CRM, Accounting, Invoicing & Billing, ERP, Project Management | CRM, Accounting, Invoicing & Billing, ERP | Accounting, Invoicing & Billing, ERP |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Workflow automation | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| SOC 2 | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Custom fields | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| Open source | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Self-hosted | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Bank integration | ✓ | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Expense tracking | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Multi-currency | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Recurring billing | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| Payroll processing | — | ✓ | — | — |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Calendar integration | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Email integration | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Integrations marketplace | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Webhooks | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Inventory tracking | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Multi-language | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Gantt charts | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Kanban boards | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Time tracking | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Custom reports | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dashboards | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pipeline management | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| Quotes & proposals | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Audit log | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.