Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Proton Pass
Proton
|
1Password
1Password
|
Bitwarden
Bitwarden
|
NordPass
Nord Security
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Free plan available
Open source
Turkish interface
Public pricing
|
Only one here with Dashboards
Free trial available
Public pricing
Longest track record — vendor founded 2006
|
Only one here with HIPAA, Self-hosted
Free plan available
Free trial available
Open source
Can run on-premise
|
Free plan available
Free trial available
Largest vendor (2,000 employees)
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks API access, Single sign-on (SSO), Role-based access +3 more — offered by others here
No free trial
Cloud only
No public adoption figures
Narrowest feature scope (7)
|
Lacks Turkish interface, Open source — offered by others here
No free plan
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
|
Lacks ISO 27001 — offered by others here
No public adoption figures
Highest starting price here ($10 / year)
Smallest vendor (250 employees) — check support capacity
Least established — vendor founded 2016
|
Lacks Turkish interface, Open source, Offline mode +1 more — offered by others here
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Privacy-focused with end-to-end encryption
Open source apps
Built-in email aliases for signups
|
Polished, intuitive apps across all platforms
Strong team sharing and admin controls
Useful extras like Watchtower and developer tools
|
Open source with independently auditable code
Generous free plan and low-cost paid tiers
Self-hosting option for full control
|
Simple, clean interface that is easy to learn
Modern encryption and breach monitoring
Free plan for personal use
|
| Considerations |
Younger product with fewer enterprise features
Business admin controls are limited
Best value when using other Proton services
|
Pricier than some competitors
Self-hosting is not offered
|
Interface is functional but less polished
Autofill can be less smooth than premium rivals
Advanced admin features need enterprise plan
|
Fewer advanced features than mature rivals
Free plan limits sessions to one device at a time
Business admin tools are still maturing
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | $2.99 / month | $2.99 / month | $10 / year | Free plan available |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Subscription | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Target size | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market |
| Industries served | — | — | — | — |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | 150K | — | — |
| Vendor employees | 500 | 1,500 | 250 | 2,000 |
| Headquarters | Cenevre, CH | Toronto, CA | Santa Barbara, US | Vilnius, LT |
| Founded | 2014 | 2006 | 2016 | 2012 |
| Categories | Password Managers | Password Managers | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| Features | ||||
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | — | — | ✓ | — |
| ISO 27001 | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| SOC 2 | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | — | ✓ | — |
| Self-hosted | — | — | ✓ | — |
| API access | — | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Mobile app | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-language | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Offline mode | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | — | ✓ | — |
| Dashboards | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Audit log | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.