Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Sentry
Sentry
|
Datadog
Datadog
|
New Relic
New Relic
|
LogRocket
LogRocket
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Free trial available
Can run on-premise
Public pricing
Largest customer base (100K)
|
Only one here with Workflow automation
Free trial available
Public pricing
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Lowest starting price here ($15 / host/month)
|
Only one here with Multi-language
Longest track record — vendor founded 2008
|
Only one here with Segmentation
Free trial available
Can run on-premise
Public pricing
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Mobile app, Custom reports — offered by others here
|
Lacks Self-hosted — offered by others here
Cloud only
|
Lacks Self-hosted — offered by others here
No free trial
Cloud only
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
|
Lacks Webhooks, Two-factor authentication, Audit log +4 more — offered by others here
No public adoption figures
Highest starting price here ($69 / month)
Narrowest feature scope (10)
Smallest vendor (150 employees) — check support capacity
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Detailed error tracking with stack traces
Broad SDK support across languages
Developer-friendly workflow and alerts
|
Unified metrics, traces and logs in one platform
Hundreds of integrations out of the box
Powerful dashboards and alerting
|
Generous free tier to get started
Full-stack observability in one platform
Powerful query language for telemetry
|
Session replay paired with console and network logs
Speeds up frontend bug reproduction
Integrates with common error trackers and issue tools
|
| Considerations |
Event quotas can be exceeded quickly
Noise requires tuning to manage
Less suited to full infrastructure monitoring
|
Costs can escalate quickly at scale
Complex, multi-product pricing
Learning curve across many features
|
Usage-based costs can be hard to predict
Interface can be overwhelming
Querying requires some learning
|
Pricing rises with session volume
Can add overhead to page performance
Product analytics less deep than dedicated tools
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | $26 / month | $15 / host/month | Free plan available | $69 / month |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Usage-based | Usage-based | Freemium |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | — | — | — | — |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | 100K | 30K | — | — |
| Vendor employees | 450 | 6,500 | 2,500 | 150 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, US | New York, US | San Francisco, US | Boston, US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2010 | 2008 | 2016 |
| Categories | Application Monitoring (APM) | Application Monitoring (APM) | Application Monitoring (APM) | Application Monitoring (APM), Product Analytics |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Workflow automation | — | ✓ | — | — |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| SOC 2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Self-hosted | ✓ | — | — | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations marketplace | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Webhooks | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Segmentation | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Mobile app | — | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Multi-language | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Custom reports | — | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Dashboards | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit log | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.