Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Sophos Intercept X
Sophos
|
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike
|
ESET PROTECT
ESET
|
Bitdefender GravityZone
Bitdefender
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Longest track record — vendor founded 1985
|
Only one here with HIPAA, Workflow automation, Integrations marketplace
Public pricing
Deloitte alliance partner
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Broadest feature coverage (15)
|
Only one here with Turkish interface
Can run on-premise
Turkish interface
|
Can run on-premise
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Mobile app, Self-hosted — offered by others here
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
|
Lacks Mobile app, Self-hosted — offered by others here
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
Least established — vendor founded 2011
|
Lacks Single sign-on (SSO), SOC 2 — offered by others here
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
Smallest vendor (1,000 employees) — check support capacity
|
Lacks Single sign-on (SSO), SOC 2 — offered by others here
No Turkish interface
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Strong anti-ransomware and exploit protection
Central management through Sophos Central
Works well alongside Sophos firewall products
|
Lightweight single agent with cloud-native management
Strong threat detection and threat intelligence
Broad platform covering EDR, XDR and more
|
Low system resource usage
Straightforward deployment and management
Cloud or on-premise console options
|
Strong malware detection with low performance impact
Single console for endpoints, servers and cloud
Includes risk analytics and patch management options
|
| Considerations |
Agent can be resource-heavy on older machines
Console navigation can feel cluttered
|
Premium pricing, especially with add-on modules
Many capabilities are sold as separate modules
Advanced features can overwhelm small IT teams
|
Advanced EDR features require higher tiers
Reporting is less flexible than some rivals
Interface can feel less modern
|
Console has a learning curve
Some modules are paid add-ons
Support experience can vary by region
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | Contact for quote | $59.99 / device/year | Price not listed | Price not listed |
| Pricing model | Quote-based | Subscription | Subscription | Subscription |
| Free plan | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, Android | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Target size | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | — | Banking & capital markets, Government & public sector, Healthcare, Technology, media & telecom, Retail & consumer, Cross-industry | — | — |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | 29K | — | — |
| Vendor employees | 4,500 | 8,500 | 1,000 | 1,800 |
| Headquarters | Abingdon, GB | Austin, US | Bratislava, SK | Bükreş, RO |
| Founded | 1985 | 2011 | 1992 | 2001 |
| Categories | Endpoint Security | Endpoint Security | Endpoint Security | Endpoint Security |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Workflow automation | — | ✓ | — | — |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | — | ✓ | — | — |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SOC 2 | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| Self-hosted | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations marketplace | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Mobile app | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-language | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turkish interface | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Custom reports | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dashboards | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit log | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| Two-factor authentication | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.