Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Airtable
Airtable
|
Smartsheet
Smartsheet
|
Coda
Superhuman (eski Grammarly Inc.)
|
Microsoft Power Apps
Microsoft
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Free plan available
|
Only one here with Custom reports
Lowest starting price here ($9 / user/month)
Broadest feature coverage (22)
|
Free plan available
|
Only one here with Turkish interface, Offline mode
Turkish interface
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Largest vendor (228,000 employees)
Longest track record — vendor founded 1975
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Multi-language — offered by others here
No Turkish interface
Smallest vendor (900 employees) — check support capacity
Least established — vendor founded 2012
|
No free plan
No Turkish interface
No public adoption figures
|
Lacks ISO 27001, HIPAA, Dashboards +5 more — offered by others here
No Turkish interface
No public adoption figures
Narrowest feature scope (13)
|
Lacks Webhooks, Dashboards, Custom fields +4 more — offered by others here
No free plan
No public adoption figures
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Spreadsheet-like interface that is easy to adopt
Flexible views, automations and interfaces
Large template library and integrations
|
Familiar spreadsheet-style interface
Strong portfolio and resource management
Enterprise governance and reporting
|
Docs that work like apps with tables and formulas
Packs integrate data from other tools
Good for building lightweight internal tools
|
Tight integration with Microsoft 365, Teams and Dataverse
Large library of connectors to business systems
Lets business users build apps with little code
|
| Considerations |
Record and automation limits on lower plans
Per-seat pricing gets expensive for larger teams
Not designed for very large or complex datasets
|
Interface can feel dated
Advanced capabilities require premium add-ons
Less suited to agile software workflows
|
Learning curve for formulas and automations
Large docs can become slow
Pricing based on doc makers can be confusing
|
Licensing for premium connectors is confusing
Performance and UI flexibility can be limited
Best value only inside the Microsoft ecosystem
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | $20 / user/month | $9 / user/month | $10 / user/month | $20 / user/month |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Subscription | Freemium | Subscription |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, iOS, Android |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Target size | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | — | — | — | — |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | 500K | — | — | — |
| Vendor employees | 900 | 3,300 | 1,000 | 228,000 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, US | Bellevue, US | San Francisco, US | Redmond, US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2006 | 2009 | 1975 |
| Categories | Project Management, Low-Code / No-Code | Project Management | Notes & Knowledge Management, Low-Code / No-Code | Low-Code / No-Code |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Workflow automation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| SOC 2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom fields | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| Template library | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations marketplace | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webhooks | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Zapier integration | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| Mobile app | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-language | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Offline mode | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Turkish interface | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Gantt charts | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| Kanban boards | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| Custom reports | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Dashboards | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| Audit log | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.