comparare

Compare

Review up to 6 products side by side.

JSON
Azure DevOps logo
Azure DevOps
Microsoft
Jira logo
Jira
Atlassian
GitHub logo
GitHub
GitHub
GitLab logo
GitLab
GitLab
Head-to-head in this comparison
Advantages
Turkish interface
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Largest vendor (228,000 employees)
Longest track record — vendor founded 1975
Only one here with Custom reports, Custom fields, Zapier integration +1 more
Free trial available
Deloitte alliance partner
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Broadest feature coverage (20)
Free trial available
Lowest starting price here ($4 / user/month)
Only one here with Open source
Free trial available
Turkish interface
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Drawbacks
Lacks Mobile app, AI features — offered by others here
No free trial
No public adoption figures
Lacks Turkish interface, Self-hosted — offered by others here
No Turkish interface
No public adoption figures
Lacks Turkish interface, Dashboards — offered by others here
No Turkish interface
Lacks Integrations marketplace, Mobile app — offered by others here
No public adoption figures
Highest starting price here ($29 / user/month)
Smallest vendor (2,100 employees) — check support capacity
Least established — vendor founded 2011
Editorial assessment
Strengths
End-to-end suite with boards, repos and pipelines
Strong integration with Azure and Microsoft tools
Flexible pipelines for many platforms
Powerful agile boards, sprints and backlogs
Highly customizable workflows and fields
Large marketplace of apps and integrations
Large developer community and ecosystem
Integrated Actions for CI/CD
Strong pull request and code review tools
Single application from planning to deployment
Built-in CI/CD with self-hosting option
Integrated security scanning
Considerations
Interface can feel complex
Best suited to Microsoft-centric teams
Some modules feel less modern than rivals
Steep learning curve for new users
Can feel slow and cluttered at scale
Marketplace apps add to the total cost
Actions minutes and storage can add cost
Advanced security features are paid add-ons
Project management is lighter than dedicated tools
Interface can feel complex and dense
Self-managed instances need maintenance
Many advanced features require top tiers
Product & company facts
Deloitte alliance ✕ ✓ ✕ ✕
Rating — — — —
Starting price $6 / user/month $7.53 / user/month $4 / user/month $29 / user/month
Pricing model Freemium Freemium Freemium Freemium
Free plan ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Free trial ✕ ✓ ✓ ✓
Open source ✕ ✕ ✕ ✕
Deployment Cloud (SaaS), On-premise Cloud (SaaS), On-premise Cloud (SaaS), On-premise Cloud (SaaS), On-premise
Platforms Web Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android Web
Turkish interface ✓ ✕ ✕ ✓
Target size Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Industries served — Technology, media & telecom, Cross-industry, Banking & capital markets, Government & public sector — —
Active users — — 100M —
Customers — — — —
Vendor employees 228,000 12,000 3,000 2,100
Headquarters Redmond, US Sydney, AU San Francisco, US San Francisco, US
Founded 1975 2002 2007 2011
Categories Project Management, DevOps & Version Control Project Management, DevOps & Version Control DevOps & Version Control DevOps & Version Control
Features
AI features — ✓ ✓ ✓
Workflow automation ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
GDPR compliance ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
ISO 27001 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
SOC 2 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Custom fields — ✓ — —
Open source — — — ✓
Self-hosted ✓ — ✓ ✓
API access ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Integrations marketplace ✓ ✓ ✓ —
Webhooks ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Zapier integration — ✓ — —
Mobile app — ✓ ✓ —
Multi-language ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Turkish interface ✓ — — ✓
Gantt charts — ✓ — —
Kanban boards ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Custom reports — ✓ — —
Dashboards ✓ ✓ — ✓
Audit log ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Role-based access ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Single sign-on (SSO) ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Two-factor authentication ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.

Compare
Compare →