Compare

+ Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure

+ Turkish interface

+ Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure

+ Broadest feature coverage (24)

+ Largest customer base (245K)

+ Only one here with Calendar integration

+ Turkish interface

+ Deloitte alliance partner

+ Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure

+ Lowest starting price here ($5 / user/month)

− Lacks Turkish interface — offered by others here

− No Turkish interface

− No public adoption figures

− Smallest vendor (1,000 employees) — check support capacity

− Least established — vendor founded 2016

− Lacks Turkish interface — offered by others here

− No Turkish interface

− Highest starting price here ($10.99 / user/month)

− Lacks Audit log, ISO 27001, HIPAA +3 more — offered by others here

− No public adoption figures

− Narrowest feature scope (19)

+ Combines tasks, docs, chat and goals in one tool

+ Highly customizable views and fields

+ Feature-rich free plan

+ Clean, intuitive interface

+ Multiple views including list, board and timeline

+ Strong goal and portfolio tracking

+ Visual, colorful boards that are easy to adopt

+ Flexible automations and templates

+ Wide range of integrations

+ Very easy to learn Kanban boards

+ Generous free plan for small teams

+ Power-Ups extend functionality

− Overwhelming number of features and settings

− Performance can lag in large workspaces

− Steep learning curve to set up well

− Key features locked behind higher tiers

− Tasks can only have one assignee

− Can get expensive as teams grow

− Seat-bundle pricing can be inflexible

− Automation and integration limits on lower tiers

− Complex setups can become hard to maintain

− Limited for complex projects and reporting

− Advanced views require paid plans

− Boards can become cluttered at scale