Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Epic
Epic Systems
|
Unite Us Platform
Unite Us
|
Veeva Vault CRM
Veeva Systems
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Can run on-premise
Longest track record — vendor founded 1979
Most deployment options (Cloud (SaaS), On-premise)
|
Only one here with White label, Segmentation
|
Only one here with Online payments
|
Only one here with Calendar integration, Offline mode, Omnichannel
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Broadest feature coverage (11)
|
| Drawbacks | No relative drawback on tracked data |
Lacks Single sign-on (SSO), Role-based access, Audit log +2 more — offered by others here
Cloud only
Least established — vendor founded 2014
|
Lacks Mobile app, Single sign-on (SSO), Audit log +1 more — offered by others here
Cloud only
|
Lacks HIPAA — offered by others here
Cloud only
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Comprehensive clinical, billing and patient modules
Strong interoperability between Epic organizations
MyChart patient portal widely adopted
|
White-label experience branded for health plans and providers
Consolidates benefits and health services in one app
Partner marketplace extends available services
|
Closed-loop referrals between health and social services
Shared network connects community organizations
Analytics track outcomes and service gaps
|
Purpose-built for life sciences commercial teams
Supports compliant field and medical engagement
Integrates with Veeva data and content applications
|
| Considerations |
Very high implementation and licensing costs
Long, resource-intensive rollouts
Customization relies on certified specialists
|
Requires integration work with payer and provider systems
Sold mainly to large healthcare organizations
|
Value depends on local network participation
Onboarding partner organizations takes effort
|
Narrow focus on life sciences
Best value within the Veeva ecosystem
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | Contact for quote | Contact for quote | Contact for quote | Contact for quote |
| Pricing model | Quote-based | Quote-based | Quote-based | Quote-based |
| Free plan | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Free trial | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android | Web | Web, iOS, Windows, macOS |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Enterprise | Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Life sciences, Government & public sector | Healthcare, Insurance, Government & public sector | Healthcare, Government & public sector, Nonprofit, Insurance | Life sciences, Healthcare, Retail & consumer |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | — | — | — |
| Vendor employees | — | 400 | — | — |
| Headquarters | Verona, WI, US | Toronto, CA | New York, US | Pleasanton, US |
| Founded | 1979 | 2014 | 2013 | 2007 |
| Categories | Healthcare & Life Sciences | Healthcare & Life Sciences | Healthcare & Life Sciences | CRM, Healthcare & Life Sciences |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | ✓ | — | — | ✓ |
| Omnichannel | — | — | — | ✓ |
| HIPAA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| White label | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Online payments | — | — | ✓ | — |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Calendar integration | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Segmentation | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Mobile app | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Offline mode | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Custom reports | ✓ | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dashboards | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit log | ✓ | — | — | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | ✓ | — | — | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.