Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft
|
PingOne
Ping Identity
|
Auth0
Okta
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Free plan available
Can run on-premise
Turkish interface
Public pricing
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
Turkish interface
Public pricing
Deloitte alliance partner
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Broadest feature coverage (17)
|
Can run on-premise
Deloitte alliance partner
Most deployment options (Cloud (SaaS), On-premise, Hybrid)
|
Only one here with White label
Free plan available
Public pricing
Deloitte alliance partner
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Webhooks, Integrations marketplace — offered by others here
No public adoption figures
|
No free plan
Cloud only
|
Lacks Turkish interface, Dashboards, Integrations marketplace — offered by others here
No free plan
No Turkish interface
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
|
Lacks Mobile app, Multi-language, Turkish interface +3 more — offered by others here
Cloud only
No Turkish interface
No public adoption figures
Highest starting price here ($35 / month)
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Native identity layer for Microsoft 365 and Azure
Conditional access and MFA included in many plans
|
Vendor-neutral SSO with a large app integration network
Robust MFA and lifecycle management
Reliable, user-friendly login experience
|
Strong support for complex hybrid enterprise environments
Flexible federation and standards support
Covers workforce and customer identity
|
Developer-friendly SDKs and documentation
Highly extensible authentication flows
Supports social, enterprise and passwordless login
|
| Considerations |
Advanced features require premium licenses
Configuration can be complex in hybrid setups
Less neutral for non-Microsoft-centric stacks
|
Costs add up as modules are added
Advanced features sold as separate products
Can be pricey for small organizations
|
Implementation requires specialized expertise
Admin experience can feel complex
|
Pricing rises steeply as active users grow
Advanced features locked to higher tiers
Complex customization can be time-consuming
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | $6 / user/month | $6 / user/month | Contact for quote | $35 / month |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Subscription | Quote-based | Freemium |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Hybrid | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise, Hybrid | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise | Enterprise | Freelancer, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | — | Technology, media & telecom, Banking & capital markets, Healthcare, Government & public sector, Retail & consumer, Cross-industry | Banking & capital markets, Insurance, Healthcare, Government & public sector, Retail & consumer, Cross-industry | Technology, media & telecom, Banking & capital markets, Healthcare, Government & public sector, Retail & consumer, Cross-industry |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | 19K | — | — |
| Vendor employees | 228,000 | 6,000 | 2,500 | 6,000 |
| Headquarters | Redmond, US | San Francisco, US | Denver, US | San Francisco, US |
| Founded | 1975 | 2009 | 2002 | 2009 |
| Categories | Identity & Access Management | Identity & Access Management | Identity & Access Management | Identity & Access Management |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Workflow automation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SOC 2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| White label | — | — | — | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations marketplace | — | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Webhooks | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Multi-language | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Turkish interface | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| Dashboards | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| Audit log | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.