Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
HubSpot Service Hub
HubSpot
|
Zendesk
Zendesk
|
Freshdesk
Freshworks
|
Intercom
Intercom
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Free plan available
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Largest vendor (8,246 employees)
Longest track record — vendor founded 2006
|
Only one here with Turkish interface
Turkish interface
Largest customer base (100K)
|
Only one here with Time tracking
Free plan available
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
No relative advantage on tracked data |
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Audit log, SOC 2, ISO 27001 +2 more — offered by others here
No Turkish interface
No public adoption figures
Narrowest feature scope (18)
|
No free plan
|
No Turkish interface
No public adoption figures
|
Lacks Email integration — offered by others here
No free plan
No Turkish interface
Highest starting price here ($29 / user/month)
Smallest vendor (1,000 employees) — check support capacity
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Support tickets tied to shared CRM data
Free tools to get started
Knowledge base and customer feedback tools
|
Mature ticketing across email, chat, voice and social
Large marketplace of integrations
Scales from small teams to enterprises
|
Free plan for small support teams
Intuitive ticketing interface
Built-in automations and SLA management
|
Modern messenger and support inbox
Fin AI agent for automated resolutions
Strong product tours and proactive messaging
|
| Considerations |
Advanced features require costly tiers
Less specialized than dedicated help desks
Best value when using other HubSpot hubs
|
Costs rise with add-ons and higher tiers
Admin configuration can be complex
AI features often priced separately
|
Key features reserved for higher tiers
Reporting can feel limited
Omnichannel requires a separate suite
|
Pricing complex and costly at scale
AI resolutions billed on usage
Some features require add-ons
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | $15 / user/month | $19 / agent/month | $15 / agent/month | $29 / user/month |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Subscription | Freemium | Subscription |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | — | — | — | — |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | 100K | — | 25K |
| Vendor employees | 8,246 | 3,830 | 4,900 | 1,000 |
| Headquarters | Cambridge, MA, US | San Francisco, CA, US | San Mateo, US | San Francisco, CA, US |
| Founded | 2006 | 2007 | 2010 | 2011 |
| Categories | Help Desk, Customer Success | Help Desk, Live Chat, Contact Center & VoIP | Help Desk | Help Desk, Live Chat |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Workflow automation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Chatbot | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Knowledge base | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Omnichannel | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SLA management | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SOC 2 | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom fields | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email integration | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Integrations marketplace | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webhooks | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-language | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turkish interface | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Time tracking | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Custom reports | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dashboards | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit log | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.