Compare

+ Longest track record — vendor founded 2006

+ Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure

+ Only one here with Turkish interface

+ Turkish interface

+ Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure

+ Largest customer base (245K)

+ Largest vendor (2,500 employees)

+ Lowest starting price here ($7 / user/month)

− No Turkish interface

− No public adoption figures

− No Turkish interface

− Highest starting price here ($10.99 / user/month)

− No Turkish interface

− No public adoption figures

− Least established — vendor founded 2016

+ Scales well for large, cross-functional teams

+ Robust resource and workload management

+ Custom request forms and approval workflows

+ Clean, intuitive interface

+ Multiple views including list, board and timeline

+ Strong goal and portfolio tracking

+ Visual, colorful boards that are easy to adopt

+ Flexible automations and templates

+ Wide range of integrations

+ Combines tasks, docs, chat and goals in one tool

+ Highly customizable views and fields

+ Feature-rich free plan

− Learning curve for new users

− Interface can feel busy

− Key features reserved for higher tiers

− Key features locked behind higher tiers

− Tasks can only have one assignee

− Can get expensive as teams grow

− Seat-bundle pricing can be inflexible

− Automation and integration limits on lower tiers

− Complex setups can become hard to maintain

− Overwhelming number of features and settings

− Performance can lag in large workspaces

− Steep learning curve to set up well