Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Adobe Workfront
Adobe
|
Asana
Asana
|
Smartsheet
Smartsheet
|
Wrike
Wrike
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Deloitte alliance partner
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Largest vendor (30,000 employees)
Longest track record — vendor founded 1982
|
Free plan available
Free trial available
Public pricing
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
Free trial available
Public pricing
Lowest starting price here ($9 / user/month)
|
Free plan available
Free trial available
Public pricing
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Webhooks, Two-factor authentication, GDPR compliance +9 more — offered by others here
No free plan
No free trial
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
|
Highest starting price here ($10.99 / user/month)
Least established — vendor founded 2011
|
Lacks Time tracking — offered by others here
No free plan
No public adoption figures
|
No public adoption figures
Smallest vendor (1,000 employees) — check support capacity
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Robust resource and capacity planning
Strong proofing and approval workflows
Integrates with Adobe Creative Cloud
|
Clean, intuitive interface
Multiple views including list, board and timeline
Strong goal and portfolio tracking
|
Familiar spreadsheet-style interface
Strong portfolio and resource management
Enterprise governance and reporting
|
Scales well for large, cross-functional teams
Robust resource and workload management
Custom request forms and approval workflows
|
| Considerations |
Steep learning curve for new users
Interface can feel dense and complex
Expensive for smaller teams
|
Key features locked behind higher tiers
Tasks can only have one assignee
Can get expensive as teams grow
|
Interface can feel dated
Advanced capabilities require premium add-ons
Less suited to agile software workflows
|
Learning curve for new users
Interface can feel busy
Key features reserved for higher tiers
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | Contact for quote | $10.99 / user/month | $9 / user/month | $10 / user/month |
| Pricing model | Quote-based | Freemium | Subscription | Freemium |
| Free plan | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Free trial | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | Retail & consumer, Technology, media & telecom, Banking & capital markets, Cross-industry | — | — | — |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | 150K | — | — |
| Vendor employees | 30,000 | 1,800 | 3,300 | 1,000 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, US | San Francisco, US | Bellevue, US | San Diego, US |
| Founded | 1982 | 2011 | 2006 | 2006 |
| Categories | Project Management | Project Management | Project Management | Project Management |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Workflow automation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| GDPR compliance | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SOC 2 | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom fields | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Template library | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations marketplace | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webhooks | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Zapier integration | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-language | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Gantt charts | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kanban boards | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Time tracking | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Custom reports | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dashboards | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit log | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.