Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Copper
Copper
|
HubSpot CRM
HubSpot
|
Pipedrive
Pipedrive
|
Zoho CRM
Zoho Corporation
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Lowest starting price here ($9 / user/month)
|
Free plan available
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
Only one here with Kanban boards
Turkish interface
|
Only one here with Audit log, SOC 2, ISO 27001 +2 more
Free plan available
Turkish interface
Broadest feature coverage (26)
Largest customer base (250K)
|
| Drawbacks |
Lacks Single sign-on (SSO), AI features, Integrations marketplace +4 more — offered by others here
No free plan
No Turkish interface
No public adoption figures
Narrowest feature scope (14)
|
Lacks Multi-currency, Turkish interface — offered by others here
No Turkish interface
Highest starting price here ($15 / user/month)
|
No free plan
|
No relative drawback on tracked data |
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Native Google Workspace and Gmail integration
Minimal manual data entry
Simple interface for relationship tracking
|
Generous free CRM tier to get started
Intuitive interface with quick onboarding
Tight integration with HubSpot marketing and service tools
|
Visual drag-and-drop sales pipeline
Easy to set up and adopt for small teams
Good mobile app and activity reminders
|
Competitive pricing with a free plan
Broad customization and automation options
Integrates with the wider Zoho app suite
|
| Considerations |
Less appealing outside the Google ecosystem
Limited advanced automation and reporting
Fewer third-party integrations
|
Costs rise sharply when moving to higher tiers
Advanced reporting and automation locked behind paid hubs
Customization is more limited than enterprise CRMs
|
Limited marketing features without add-ons
Reporting is basic on lower plans
Less suited to complex enterprise requirements
|
Interface can feel cluttered and dated
Setup of advanced features takes effort
Support quality varies by plan
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | $9 / user/month | $15 / user/month | $14 / user/month | $14 / user/month |
| Pricing model | Subscription | Freemium | Subscription | Freemium |
| Free plan | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Target size | Small business, Mid-market | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Industries served | — | — | — | — |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | — | 247.9K | 100K | 250K |
| Vendor employees | 150 | 8,246 | 1,000 | 18,000 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, US | Cambridge, MA, US | New York, NY, US | Chennai, IN |
| Founded | 2013 | 2006 | 2010 | 1996 |
| Categories | CRM | CRM, Sales Engagement | CRM | CRM |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Workflow automation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | — | — | — | ✓ |
| SOC 2 | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Custom fields | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-currency | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Calendar integration | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email integration | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrations marketplace | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webhooks | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Zapier integration | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Inventory tracking | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Mobile app | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-language | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Turkish interface | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kanban boards | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Custom reports | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dashboards | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lead scoring | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pipeline management | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Quotes & proposals | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit log | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.