Compare
Review up to 6 products side by side.
|
Sprout Social
Sprout Social
|
Hootsuite
Hootsuite
|
Agorapulse
Agorapulse
|
Sprinklr Social
Sprinklr
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head-to-head in this comparison | ||||
| Advantages |
Free trial available
Public pricing
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
|
Only one here with Calendar integration
Free trial available
Public pricing
Lowest starting price here ($99 / user/month)
Longest track record — vendor founded 2008
|
Free plan available
Free trial available
|
Only one here with Audit log, SOC 2, ISO 27001 +1 more
Deloitte alliance partner
Vendor is publicly listed — audited financial disclosure
Broadest feature coverage (12)
Largest vendor (3,600 employees)
|
| Drawbacks |
No free plan
Highest starting price here ($199 / user/month)
|
Lacks Omnichannel — offered by others here
No free plan
No public adoption figures
|
Lacks Single sign-on (SSO), Integrations marketplace, Omnichannel — offered by others here
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
Narrowest feature scope (8)
Smallest vendor (250 employees) — check support capacity
|
Lacks Mobile app, Two-factor authentication, Integrations marketplace — offered by others here
No free plan
No free trial
Pricing only on request
No public adoption figures
|
| Editorial assessment | ||||
| Strengths |
Polished, intuitive interface
Strong reporting and social listening
Unified smart inbox for engagement
|
Supports many social networks in one dashboard
Scheduling and team approval workflows
Large app integration directory
|
Efficient unified social inbox
Collaboration and approval tools for teams
Helpful customer support
|
Unified platform for large-scale social operations
Broad channel coverage and listening
Governance and workflow controls for enterprises
|
| Considerations |
Per-seat pricing is expensive
Listening and advanced features cost extra
Overkill for very small teams
|
Pricing high for small teams
Analytics depth tied to premium plans
Interface can feel cluttered
|
Costs rise with additional users
Fewer integrations than larger rivals
Some reports only on higher plans
|
Complex to implement and learn
Designed mainly for large enterprises
|
| Product & company facts | ||||
| Deloitte alliance | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Rating | — | — | — | — |
| Starting price | $199 / user/month | $99 / user/month | Free plan available | Contact for quote |
| Pricing model | Subscription | Subscription | Freemium | Quote-based |
| Free plan | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Open source | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
| Turkish interface | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Target size | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market | Enterprise |
| Industries served | — | — | — | Retail & consumer, Technology, media & telecom, Banking & capital markets, Transportation & logistics, Cross-industry |
| Active users | — | — | — | — |
| Customers | 30K | — | — | — |
| Vendor employees | 1,300 | 1,000 | 250 | 3,600 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, IL, US | Vancouver, CA | Paris, FR | New York, NY, US |
| Founded | 2010 | 2008 | 2011 | 2009 |
| Categories | Social Media Management | Social Media Management | Social Media Management | Social Media Management, Customer Data Platform (CDP) |
| Features | ||||
| AI features | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Omnichannel | ✓ | — | — | ✓ |
| GDPR compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | — | — | — | ✓ |
| SOC 2 | — | — | — | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Calendar integration | — | ✓ | — | — |
| Integrations marketplace | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
| Mobile app | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Multi-language | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Custom reports | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dashboards | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audit log | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Role-based access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single sign-on (SSO) | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Two-factor authentication | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
Feature marks are based on our curated data; “—” means not verified, not necessarily missing. Head-to-head points are derived from this data relative to the selected products; editorial points are curated summaries.